IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D

Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Fri, 04 September 2015 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F891A8A3C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:32:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yI6BOxU7X4-7 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:32:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D26A01A877F for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 07:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so20011210wic.0 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:reply-to:to:cc:date :in-reply-to:references:organization:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X9evtcDgRoHtJD/CqRR7yMEt8xI9Rodc3ERRooeypHc=; b=kGd/tPKmQIjJXFGTYBYjjpS2YyKWmHhP4Ro2rvE7SVkpQ3XfLfsrGdOEfmaGGnBEpI rPfWIn+gylWU/eE7p4H0fVFqsD+xvJOm9+ZoQz+SK1gAVRBRIF3Z5xPTil59BbZs/1KH atmEEUMyhhM4oFnt5CyWTJX6r1GBr9xkFGCFBzphTaxBBhj2OE6se+G+727pB4l0xqRu PTzYKCt8idgss7X5y4cttrQFs6mk0XREALnV44CQ2dwsajLk1VkaR18QlS3EFdFqXdSD 69FHvVwZEn9WmrndGzLw/kk6sb9wYCb5ycp7H9TvVH7wqHZuyVrTUOWWEZlIWHqhBw7q WGww==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCRW8F2klbSzsYpb6WN6jXz5nuWG71q0vGTTQk025AROCDnAZm500juFEmtete7M0XO41V
X-Received: by 10.194.92.166 with SMTP id cn6mr7966723wjb.6.1441377137365; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acorde ([2001:720:410:1010:d6be:d9ff:fe6b:349c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fz5sm4695891wic.18.2015.09.04.07.32.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1441377135.31632.14.camel@it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 16:32:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T1d9TOHMBGB=9qLPWibnyoFB4GefGkoMYcWENoZ6GJdFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA5F1T1d9TOHMBGB=9qLPWibnyoFB4GefGkoMYcWENoZ6GJdFA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/pZcefWXMidg_1f2IRLl7tEgUi8I>
Cc: "netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 14:32:22 -0000

Hi,

As editor of the I-D, I support the document.

The I-D is expired because I was waiting for your action as per your e
-mail in March, where you stated that you would review the I-D and
issue the WG LC.

Regards,

Carlos

On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 16:11 -0500, Basavaraj Patil wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We would like to do a quick poll on the I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6 
> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility <draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6
> -flowmob>
> 
> Current status of this I-D: Expired (as of Aug 29th).
> 
> The flow mobility I-D proposed : "extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6 
> protocol that are
>    required to support network based flow mobility over multiple
>    physical interfaces"
> 
> Question to the WG: 
> 
> How relevant is this work and this extension to the protocol at this 
> phase of the PMIP6 protocols lifecycle? 
> 
> Should we standardize this extension or simply drop it.
> 
> Standardize it [  ]
> Drop it    [  ]
> 
> Your feedback is appreciated. Please respond by 9/11/15. 
> 
> Rgds,
> -Chairs
> 
> 
> -- 
> Basavaraj Patil
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email