Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 as Netext WG doc?

Hi,

I'm in favor of this document but I've one question:

In the current version, the LMA makes decision to move flows and the MN
follows that decision to forward packets on the right interface.
However, during IETf80, we had good arguments in favour of the MN making
decision to move flows. 

So, the question is: do you plan, in this I-D, to consider also MN
initiated mobility management or shall we consider only network
initiated mobility  ?

Pierrick

> 
> Betreff: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D
draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-
> flowmob-03 as Netext WG doc?
> 
> Hello,
> 
> At IETF81 the chairs made a proposal to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile
IPv6
> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility
> <draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03> As the starting point for
> the specification defining flow mobility for Proxy Mobile IPv6.
> We gauged support for and against adopting this I-D at the IETF81 WG
> meeting with the following result:
> 
> In favor: 18
> Opposed: None
> 
> As per process we are following up on the mailing list with the same
> question. Please respond by Aug 18th, 2011 to the question below:
> 
> Q: Should we adopt as Netext WG I-D the document:
> draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 which will be used as the
> starting point in specifying the flow mobility feature for Proxy
> Mobile IPv6?
> 
> Yes   [ ]
> No    [ ]
> 
> 
> -Chairs
> 
> IETF81 WG minutes are posted at:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext