Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option

Mohana Jeyatharan <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com> Tue, 16 August 2011 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1C021F8CFE for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2s0Mw6GqKZF for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mei.co.jp (smtp.mei.co.jp [133.183.100.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1890021F8CEB for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw.jp.panasonic.com ([157.8.1.157]) by smtp.mei.co.jp (8.12.11.20060614/3.7W/kc-maile11) with ESMTP id p7G1JsJD002081; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:19:54 +0900 (JST)
Received: from pslexc01.psl.local ([10.81.112.5]) by mail.jp.panasonic.com (8.11.6p2/3.7W/kc-maili12) with ESMTP id p7G1Jsw18029; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 10:19:54 +0900
Received: from PSLEXC02.psl.local ([10.81.112.4]) by pslexc01.psl.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:19:45 +0800
Received: from PSLEXC02.psl.local ([fe80::9c06:d1db:685d:9713]) by pslexc02.psl.local ([fe80::9c06:d1db:685d:9713%14]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Tue, 16 Aug 2011 09:19:53 +0800
From: Mohana Jeyatharan <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
To: "Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com" <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
Thread-Index: AQHMV6e2nRIxJbBIkkC03uyU0YByhpUetjaQ
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:19:52 +0000
Message-ID: <3B9866CDE401014DB02613517E88E1E60576BD5A@pslexc02.psl.local>
References: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA6867A8.1CF3A%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.113.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2011 01:19:45.0433 (UTC) FILETIME=[95512090:01CC5BB2]
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 01:19:08 -0000

Hi Raj, all,

I support the adoption of this document.

The answers to the questions are:
[1] Yes
[2] Yes

BR,
Mohana

> -----Original Message-----
> From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:52 AM
> To: netext@ietf.org
> Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt selective IPv4 offloading feature as
> specified in I-D draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option
> 
> 
> 
> At IETF81, the Netext WG discussed the proposal: "IP Traffic Offload Selector
> Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6"
> <draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt>
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    This specification defines a mechanism and a related mobility option
>    for carrying IP Offload traffic selectors between a mobile access
>    gateway and a local mobility anchor in a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain.
>    Based on the received offload flow selectors from the local mobility
>    anchor, a mobile access gateway can enable offload traffic rule on
>    the selected IP flows.
> 
> Please note that the offloading of traffic from the MAG is limited to
> IPv4 flow only using NAT44 functionality.
> 
> The general consensus of the room at the IETF81 WG meeting was that this is
> a relevant problem and should be solved by the WG. As per the
> minutes:
> "
> 11 people think we should solve the problem, 4 think we should not.
> "
> 
> As per process, the same question is now being asked on the Netext WG ML
> before making a decision.
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1. Is the solution to offloading specific IPv4 flows from a MAG of interest to
> the WG?
> 
> Yes   [ ]
> No    [ ]
> 
> 2. Should we adopt as WG I-D:
> draft-gundavelli-netext-pmipv6-sipto-option-01.txt which will serve as the
> starting point in specifying the solution?
> 
> Yes  [ ]
> No   [ ]
> 
> Please respond to the above questions by August 18, 2011 on the ML.
> 
> -Chairs
> 
> The slides presented at the meeting are available in the IETF81 proceedings.
> Minutes have been posted to the ML and are also available
> at: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/81/minutes/netext.txt
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext