Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03

With Chair hat on:

Please see: 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02130.html

The LMA initiated feature will be considered if a reasonable solution is
proposed and accepted by the WG at a later date. However it will not be a
part of the initial WG document.

-Raj

On 8/19/11 11:41 AM, "ext Rajeev Koodli" <rkoodli@cisco.com> wrote:

>
><Chair hat off>
>
>My understanding is that the topic will be discussed after we have a WG
>document (which is long overdue).
>
>Raj: please clarify otherwise.
>
>Thanks.
>
>-Rajeev
>
>
>
>On 8/19/11 9:07 AM, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Behcet,
>> You may have missed the mail exchange between Julien, Stefano and Raj
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02123.html where
>>upon
>> chairs initiated the new proposal as described in
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02130.html.
>> Personally I would also have liked to include text in the draft which
>> recommends proper measures in case of LMA/HA initiated flow switching on
>> required re-assurance between LMA and current MAG that MN ist still
>>able to
>> access the new MAG instead of removing it completely ...
>> 
>> Fact is that a majority voted for adoption of the draft with LMA text
>>before
>> Aug. 12 ...
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Dirk
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] Im
>>Auftrag von
>> Behcet Sarikaya
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 19. August 2011 17:18
>> An: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com; netext@ietf.org
>> Betreff: Re: [netext] Conclusion of consensus call to adopt
>> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> The consensus call on whether to adopt as WG I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6
>>> Extensions to Support Flow Mobility,
>>> I-D:draft-bernardos-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-03 has now been completed.
>>> Please see
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/current/msg02068.html for
>>> the details of the consensus call itself.
>>> 
>>> Conclusion is as follows:
>>> 
>>> There is strong consensus to adopt the I-D as the starting point of
>>> the work in the working group with the condition that the LMA
>>> initiated flow switching feature be removed from the text prior to it
>>> being posted as the WG doc.
>> 
>> 
>> Remove LMA initiated flow switching?
>> 
>> What are you talking about?
>> 
>> It is 95% of the draft. The design team agreed to make it LMA initiated.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I could not see the consensus on this technical issue from the mail,
>>how did
>> it come about?
>> 
>> Talk to Yokota-san, he is going to tell you why LMA/HA initiated flow
>> switching is feasible and should be done.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Behcet
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>> _______________________________________________
>> netext mailing list
>> netext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>