[netext] about the mMAG draft, and network mobility for PMIP
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 05 November 2012 22:02 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8372821F84DD for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:02:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ONzBg5seRUbO for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cirse-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF3B21F8461 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id qA5M2sG3012881 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:02:54 +0100
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qA5M2saY016995 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:02:54 +0100 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (arletty1-201-70.intra.cea.fr [132.166.201.70]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id qA5M2Jpq027407 for <netext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 23:02:53 +0100
Message-ID: <5098376A.9080300@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:02:18 +0100
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [netext] about the mMAG draft, and network mobility for PMIP
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 22:02:56 -0000
I wanted to say at the mic. I read this mMAG draft. I also read the netext wg ig pmip prefix delegation. Additioally, I co-authored another draft about pmip and network mobility. I think overall we may have an issue here about the lack of a problemm statement draft for pmip network mobility. I do not consider it blocking but it does backfire a bit here, if I can say so. One interesting aspect of mMAG (other than that it can work) is that it does not use DHCP at all. You Raj asked which operator would be interested in this mMAG concept - well any which does not implement DHCP-PD today, and there are many I think. One differentiating advantageous aspect in the netext wg item pmip prefix delegation is that it delegates a v6 as well as a v4 prefix. But it has the inconvenient of requiring mandatorily the GRE encapsulation (other kind sof encapsulaiton exist as well. Alex
- [netext] about the mMAG draft, and network mobili… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [netext] about the mMAG draft, and network mo… Seil Jeon
- Re: [netext] about the mMAG draft, and network mo… Alexandru Petrescu