IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications

Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu> Wed, 14 November 2012 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5332921F855E for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:13:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RlAFDDCvs+rd for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803B521F8528 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:13:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC50102567; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:13:45 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eH1QsxvZWopv; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:13:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from METHONE.office.hd (methone.office.hd [192.168.24.54]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1493102564; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:13:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from HYDRA.office.hd ([169.254.4.183]) by METHONE.office.hd ([192.168.24.54]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:13:08 +0100
From: Marco Liebsch <Marco.Liebsch@neclab.eu>
To: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>, "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications
Thread-Index: AQHNwUygS3xMoCnzvkGu+d3WYCHzx5fpYRSQ
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:12:24 +0000
Message-ID: <69756203DDDDE64E987BC4F70B71A26D551460EB@Hydra.office.hd>
References: <CAA5F1T3S1wAoPW4EJMeXgfKVuzE1XFhzv02LQpzKS2b4PCHKZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T3S1wAoPW4EJMeXgfKVuzE1XFhzv02LQpzKS2b4PCHKZw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.6.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org" <draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:13:48 -0000

Question that has been asked: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-update-
notifications as a working group document?

My answer:
Yes:  [X]
No :  [  ]

marco

>-----Original Message-----
>From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Basavaraj Patil
>Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2012 04:12
>To: netext@ietf.org
>Cc: draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-
>notifications
>
>
>The I-D : Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6 <draft-krishnan-netext-
>update-notifications> was presented at the WG meeting at IETF85 (Atlanta).
>There was consensus in the room to adopt this I-D as a WG document (11 in
>favor of, None against).
>
>Please treat this as a consensus call for adopting this I-D as a WG document.
>
>Question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-update-
>notifications as a working group document?
>
>Yes:  [  ]
>No :  [  ]
>
>Some background info: The 3GPP liaison to the IETF has indicated the relevance
>of this I-D to their specifications and is awaiting feedback from the AD and the
>chairs about its status.
>
>Abstract
>
>   Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network based mobility management
>   protocol that enables IP mobility for a host without requiring its
>   participation in any mobility-related signaling.  This document
>   proposes a mechanism for the Local Mobility Anchor to asynchronously
>   notify the Mobile Access Gateway about changes related to the
>   mobility session.
>
>This consensus call will expire on November 26th, 2012.
>
>-Chairs
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email