Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob

Hi Carlos,

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <
cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm restarting the discussion about the flow mobility draft. 3GPP is
> considering NB-IFOM again for Rel-13, so I think we should close this
> document as soon as possible.
>
> As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues were cleared. Rajeev
> made some comments on issue #15, brought by Pierrick, on the use of
> update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the proposed resolution?
>
>
I made many comments on the issue tracker, on the list and in meetings.
Actually we comments have now been culminated in HA-based flow mobility
protocol as in RFC 7109 (please see my previous mail on the list).

You always preferred to ignore them, why?
I remember very well, in the last face-to-face meeting the chairs asked you
to meet with me during the meeting and try to resolve the issues face to
face.
I saw you in the breaks, you never attempted to talk to me. I was ready to
talk.

Again, I think that PMIPv6 flow mobility protocol should be compatible with
RFC 7109 because on this way the implementers can reuse HA code for PMIPv6
as well.

Regards,

Behcet

> BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
> draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should also
> close that document.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>