[netext] #12: missing considerations on how to maintain consistent forwarding policies
"netext issue tracker" <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org> Wed, 21 November 2012 11:17 UTC
Return-Path: <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7602021F845D for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:17:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tq4dcI0-AWbd for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:17:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grenache.tools.ietf.org (grenache.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:1:2::30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF93821F844E for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:17:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45707 helo=grenache.tools.ietf.org ident=www-data) by grenache.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>) id 1Tb8Ix-00077m-3P; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 12:17:19 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: netext issue tracker <trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3
Precedence: bulk
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software
To: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob@tools.ietf.org, pierrick.seite@orange.com
X-Trac-Project: netext
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:17:19 -0000
X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/netext/
X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/12
Message-ID: <066.21c3ae47b2fbf187e34cb9093fff7c09@trac.tools.ietf.org>
X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 12
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob@tools.ietf.org, pierrick.seite@orange.com, netext@ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on grenache.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Resent-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
Resent-Message-Id: <20121121111730.DF93821F844E@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:17:30 -0800
Resent-From: trac+netext@trac.tools.ietf.org
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: [netext] #12: missing considerations on how to maintain consistent forwarding policies
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:17:31 -0000
#12: missing considerations on how to maintain consistent forwarding policies Introduction and section 3.2 require consistent forwarding policies in both LMA and MN. That's true, but, it should also be stressed that, when the MN (or the LMA) moves a flow (i.e. update its forwarding policy), the LMA (or the MN) must update its policy accordingly. The document states that digression on policy consistency is out of scope; but dynamic policies alignment is a key requirement and the document should gives clues on that. The point is that this document is useless if there is no way to maintain consistent policies. -- -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-netext- pierrick.seite@orange.com | pmipv6-flowmob@tools.ietf.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: pmipv6-flowmob | Version: Severity: Active WG Document | Keywords: -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/12> netext <http://tools.ietf.org/netext/>
- [netext] #12: missing considerations on how to ma… netext issue tracker
- Re: [netext] #12: missing considerations on how t… netext issue tracker
- Re: [netext] #12: missing considerations on how t… pierrick.seite
- Re: [netext] #12: missing considerations on how t… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano