Re: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications

Hi,
As most others I agree that this is no heavy protocol change and 3GPP asks for it, so on
Question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-update-
notifications as a working group document?

My answer:
Yes:  [X ]
No :  [  ]

Best regards
Dirk

>-----Original Message-----
>From: netext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Basavaraj Patil
>Sent: Dienstag, 13. November 2012 04:12
>To: netext@ietf.org
>Cc: draft-krishnan-netext-update-notifications@tools.ietf.org
>Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Adopt I-D draft-krishnan-netext-update-
>notifications
>
>
>The I-D : Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6 <draft-krishnan-netext-
>update-notifications> was presented at the WG meeting at IETF85 (Atlanta).
>There was consensus in the room to adopt this I-D as a WG document (11 in
>favor of, None against).
>
>Please treat this as a consensus call for adopting this I-D as a WG document.
>
>Question: Should the Netext WG adopt I-D: draft-krishnan-netext-update-
>notifications as a working group document?
>
>Yes:  [  ]
>No :  [  ]
>
>Some background info: The 3GPP liaison to the IETF has indicated the relevance
>of this I-D to their specifications and is awaiting feedback from the AD and the
>chairs about its status.
>
>Abstract
>
>   Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network based mobility management
>   protocol that enables IP mobility for a host without requiring its
>   participation in any mobility-related signaling.  This document
>   proposes a mechanism for the Local Mobility Anchor to asynchronously
>   notify the Mobile Access Gateway about changes related to the
>   mobility session.
>
>This consensus call will expire on November 26th, 2012.
>
>-Chairs
>

_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext