Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-08.txt]
Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> Tue, 22 October 2013 15:18 UTC
Return-Path: <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B4C11E84A9 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W9dYJ6DPsj6X for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (smtp01.uc3m.es [163.117.176.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CED211E8494 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 08:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93728CD6A6A; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [163.117.139.72] (acorde.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cjbc@smtp01.uc3m.es) by smtp01.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 874E6CD580D; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:18:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1382455119.3908.60.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
From: Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
To: "Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)" <rkoodli@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:18:39 +0200
In-Reply-To: <7C52FDEBC843C44DBAF2CA6A30662C6D01621F8F@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
References: <7C52FDEBC843C44DBAF2CA6A30662C6D01621F8F@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Organization: Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5-2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.0.0.1014-20236.000
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-08.txt]
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: cjbc@it.uc3m.es
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:18:47 -0000
Hi Rajeev, On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 05:22 +0000, Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli) wrote: > Right, we needed to discuss this before putting text - especially I saw no > response to my email about this after the last IETF meeting. BTW, I presented all the proposed changes that have been incorporated in -07 and -08 during the Berlin meeting (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/slides/slides-87-netext-6.pdf). You are specifically pointing to issue #15, brought by Pierrick a while ago (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netext/trac/ticket/15). This was discussed before Berlin on the mailing list and I responded to the issue. I presented the proposed changes in slide 9 of my presentation and there was consensus on going for it. All the proposed changes were agreed by the WG, so as the editor of the document I simply proceeded to apply them. Regards, Carlos > > In particular, I am not sure about having to implement the UPN spec for > one to do FM. Let's discuss what this means; may be I don't fully follow.. > Perhaps Carlos could spend some time at Vancouver on this. > > It would help me if the following is shown with some text for the ID. > I don't see what the text duplication is. If the text is there for UPN, we > can re-use it. > > Thanks. > > -Rajeev > > > On 10/21/13 4:16 PM, "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> > wrote: > > >Hi Carlos/Rajeev: > > > >I agree, we did not resolve this issue one way or the other. > > > >How about the following ? > > > >We can still the keep the FMI message, its use and the text in the spec. > >No changes are needed. But, under the wrappers, FMI message can be a UPN > >message with a NR code of "FMI". So, in the format section, we point to > >the UPN message. > > > >Otherwise, we have to add all the considerations around security, IPSec > >PAD entries, IPv4 transport, ..etc and that is not there currently in the > >spec. May end up duplicating lot of text. Even for implementation, its > >additional bit of text dealing with a new message type. > > > >This has least impact on the existing text. Else, we need to revert to the > >prev version. > > > >Is this a reasonable way-forward ? > > > > > > > > > >Regards > >Sri > > > > > > > > > >On 10/21/13 3:30 PM, "Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)" <rkoodli@cisco.com> wrote: > > > >> > >>Hi Carlos, > >> > >> > >>On 10/21/13 3:24 PM, "Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> > >>wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>Following the discussion during the last meeting, I've updated the > >>>draft. As requested by the WG, it now uses the Update Notifications for > >>>Proxy Mobile IPv6. > >> > >>Hmm? I don't recall any discussion on this..Perhaps I missed the > >>response(s) to my email. > >>We need to discuss this :) > >> > >>-Rajeev > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>>Comments are welcome. I'd like to ask people that submitted an issue to > >>>the tracker to see if you are happy with the revision (and close the > >>>issue if that is the case). > >>> > >>>Thanks, > >>> > >>>Carlos > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>netext mailing list > >>netext@ietf.org > >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext > > >
- [netext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flo… internet-drafts
- [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-pmip… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Rajeev Koodli (rkoodli)
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netext] [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-netext-… Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano