Re: [netext] Comments on I-D: draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation

Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 22:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F2D21F9D71 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f7+wO2ae+xXz for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A23D21F9D1C for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so1200994pbc.4 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Qo6vmZmxaPswN6lrD8JxNNq78FI31m60nTC0FvAzTAA=; b=lSQ1PSoI02bPrIAxh0gj2Tn0EPETwzoRD3m3FQCNDwDHwsOXtz6WYs0I8Bav94bLc8 G0+EmjvYn2hwYUfkByVS/Z0dCb1N3ftG6mYsh45LT4poEQDDZZArlOI3dpNutWqWyNne hisPp+6Kd2rh9jLITsZF9U2/7M4e4+Xuj0gtcH2+YBd6MypSiiwwxrp/RNan6PxFR7/u z4za7pzzLTD9uM0sOfwXXyXrTZHp8t7ikFXzGcmgm7dwLGS3UmMNMMUvcP/0QokRerN6 452XPezjGwLgXdcK2ZBv/it7Qj+N1J882GBbNy+1bmNcZN3Olp5FqxO3jCR0AOb4ZrUS I41g==
X-Received: by 10.68.189.202 with SMTP id gk10mr3748187pbc.47.1374015392687; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.201.238.205] ([202.45.12.133]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xe9sm4066528pbc.21.2013.07.16.15.56.29 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ryuji Wakikawa <ryuji.wakikawa@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA5F1T0YkB27D10J6xSiJ4tF=sSKu2ifRcQrJaUOGw3f8aJL+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:56:27 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C130107-6665-4B29-A070-0D76205DD833@gmail.com>
References: <CAA5F1T0YkB27D10J6xSiJ4tF=sSKu2ifRcQrJaUOGw3f8aJL+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>, draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] Comments on I-D: draft-wakikawa-netext-pmip-cp-up-separation
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 22:56:35 -0000

Hi Raj,

Thanks for the comments. 
I remember Vijay's proposal and found his slide;-)
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/73/slides/netlmm-4.pdf
I should probably reuse his slide in Berlin;-)

The idea is around for a while. We should standardise an extension now so that PMIP can be deployed more.

thanks,
ryuji

On Jul 17, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Ryuji,
> 
> The idea of splitting the CP and UP for PMIP6 has been around for quite a while.
> In fact if I were to recollect, Vijay D. had proposed this during the development of the PMIP6 protocol in Netlmm.
> 
> Its a good idea to allow the protocol to optionally have a separate CP/UP between the MAG and LMA. It would essentially be equivalent to 3GPPs GTP-C and GTP-U. 
> 
> The draft itself is preliminary and hopefully will be improved if the WG decides to adopt it. 
> Looking forward to the presentation/discussion in Berlin.
> 
> -Raj
> 
> -- 
> Basavaraj Patil
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext