Re: [netext] research article about a flat and distributed PMIP scheme

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 14 July 2011 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2035621F8789 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:51:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HRinIXQjXZmN for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 758B921F8785 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Jul 2011 04:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2011 11:51:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.255.131.37]) [192.100.123.77] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 14 Jul 2011 13:51:48 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+0NjdgQ8u0KnH+49HIS2qFHKoe+VkOA9nu37Yknb vzXbaIX0L76odp
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAPLDCSx-f6K3+YnS0=Wu_HSjDDew7y1rcXOOScVJMuFPbqX9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:51:46 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <452F599B-8DCE-4EDF-8C92-BE47E0CD6914@gmx.net>
References: <CAPLDCSx-f6K3+YnS0=Wu_HSjDDew7y1rcXOOScVJMuFPbqX9kQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bokor Laszlo <goodzi@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netext] research article about a flat and distributed PMIP scheme
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:51:55 -0000

Tell us, what is the conclusion with relevance for this group? 


On Jul 14, 2011, at 1:54 PM, Bokor Laszlo wrote:

> Dear Folks,
> 
> please let me advertise you a research paper about a flat and distributed PMIP scheme:
> 
> Title: Evaluation of two integrated signalling schemes for the Ultra Flat Architecture using SIP, IEEE 802.21, and HIP/PMIP protocols
> ACM link: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1975468
> DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.005
> 
> I hope you will find the above article interesting, and also that you will provide us with feedbacks on our work.
> 
> Best regards,
> goodzi
> 
> --
> László BOKOR
> Budapest University of Technology and Economics (BME)
> Department of Telecommunications (HIT) - Mobile Innovation Centre (MIK)
> Tel: +36-1-463-3420, Fax: +36-1-463-3307
> web: http://www.hit.bme.hu/~bokorl _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext