IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?

<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Wed, 10 August 2011 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120FF11E80AA for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.467, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6q-Q4prgub5 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6807111E807E for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 15:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh102.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.23]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id p7AM83SJ006662 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:08:03 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by vaebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 01:08:02 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MMR1-002.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.57) by NOK-AM1MHUB-04.mgdnok.nokia.com (65.54.30.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:08:01 +0200
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-024.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.4.61]) by 008-AM1MMR1-002.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.57]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.002; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:08:01 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: netext@ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
Thread-Index: AQHMV6n4iQzLbboj+0iLXz1Fln8x0w==
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:08:01 +0000
Message-ID: <CA686B71.1CF5F%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115
x-originating-ip: [172.19.59.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4C744363E0A6BE43A66823985EB12D22@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2011 22:08:02.0720 (UTC) FILETIME=[F919AA00:01CC57A9]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Subject: [netext] Consensus call: Specify Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6?
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 22:07:33 -0000

The proposal: "Access Network Information Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6"
<draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt> Was discussed
at the IETF81 Netext WG meeting.

Rough consensus from polling the WG members in the room indicated:
"
5 have read the draft
4 think it is a relevant problem and we have to solve it
2 think it is no clear reason to carry more than ATT
"

This email is a follow up on the WG ML before we make a decision. So
please respond to the following questions:

Q1: Do you agree with the problem, solution and benefit of the ANI
option as  described in I-D:
draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt?

Yes  [ ]
No   [ ]

Q2: Do you support adoption of the I-D
draft-gundavelli-netext-access-network-option-01.txt as the starting
point for working on this feature in the WG?

Yes  [ ]
No   [ ]


Please respond by August 18th to the above questions on the ML.

-Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email