Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677481A0305 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uoy_bjuMj2Ez for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EBF1A0342 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b8so8358298lan.19 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5vbgwcz7yFvV/U8z4gLqD8EhdCIVmKQWVZs945b82vQ=; b=Zk2FW9wVr5fEpX4GZU8Oivo2oMA8R10U4tGWDVaAdkSnp25cvLY2DulT12c2vnUQub /eH+efgj2XAkd5/Ec578rjGw7qWEG3frl3YNx1YIJ4AynOScdWaNK+h23mNN+Tna1Bky aRs+WI8hLy8Ha3YD54qS8b9TAMgA7580s9AaISVCcJrbxw90klM2BquDAKErIEYufY7g kshscXoOf849s8RZFZhF26PaAmGDHYjoe4oc6gD1zACU4aJwtxbbaEUZEw1r4wOEsSzF mdz+SvzcXRAL0iWEhRHiypEwxypmrJPDI9OWTPXAJqDYXVf5D0hbUYtm+W9f66/dbmND gNTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.22.196 with SMTP id g4mr1625550lbf.47.1392311208204; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.170.193 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 09:06:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1392230323.21827.10.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
References: <1392151601.4016.127.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es> <CAC8QAcfPdfWwUvtCW5hHt_ufTwipW3VtuDcPCSQjbHmPJifCsA@mail.gmail.com> <1392230323.21827.10.camel@acorde.it.uc3m.es>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:06:48 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccopDE+VvzAJqtugByxL_UyaniS_C_+q+PdbbCG1Am2jg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: "Carlos J. Bernardos" <cjbc@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae9473ba3fb5f6e04f24cb665"
Cc: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netext] Next steps on draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:06:56 -0000

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano <
cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:

> Hi Behcet,
>
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:35 -0600, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> > <cjbc@it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         I'm restarting the discussion about the flow mobility draft.
> >         3GPP is
> >         considering NB-IFOM again for Rel-13, so I think we should
> >         close this
> >         document as soon as possible.
> >
> >         As discussed during the last meeting, all the issues were
> >         cleared. Rajeev
> >         made some comments on issue #15, brought by Pierrick, on the
> >         use of
> >         update notifications. Rajeev, are you OK with the proposed
> >         resolution?
> >
> >
> >
> > I made many comments on the issue tracker, on the list and in
> > meetings.
> >
> > Actually we comments have now been culminated in HA-based flow
> > mobility protocol as in RFC 7109 (please see my previous mail on the
> > list).
> >
> >
> > You always preferred to ignore them, why?
>
> The WG agreed on how to resolve all your issues. The document reflects
> the WG consensus. I even remember Suresh going one by one in one meeting
> and everybody agreed.
>
>
No.

Will you please reply what follows below?


> Carlos
> >
>
 I remember very well, in the last face-to-face meeting the chairs
asked you to meet with me during the meeting and try to resolve the
  issues face to face.

  I saw you in the breaks, you never attempted to talk to me. I was
ready to talk.

?

> Again, I think that PMIPv6 flow mobility protocol should be compatible
> with RFC 7109 because on this way the implementers can reuse HA code
> for PMIPv6 as well.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Behcet
>
>         BTW, can I ask what is the current status of
>         draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support? I think we should
>         also
>         close that document.
>
>         Thanks,
>
>         Carlos
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         netext mailing list
>         netext@ietf.org
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>
>