[netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D

Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com> Thu, 03 September 2015 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <bpatil1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCBC1B3F7B for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bAL9qzyjduNI for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CA0B1A912C for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbut12 with SMTP id ut12so1786385igb.1 for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+2ZX9idYuf+ktXCmJkohSlTgjH85cgvMIlSsy9hjOCI=; b=bcpGMzmVVDmOpMKwX1j0kWZGl9DbsX84uw/adhB64Riq4ZCuB0zCJQfB0rTie5UqMg YHbiwqXp57TKxpAHPsVf0rHCqyZwcuUx1dzE/sYg+uAvJnpx/6WmEqsjpS5uRpFObkD2 Jeh60/g9wgApE8T9v7GmuPokVECJfOiTB5K0JB2oJZiaoQBSaX4DXC7GYC+Ro9NBlrTH r4FRmes8vORyfD7UDdPWekIiggRscqNy/WI2hmg4k8Ahbd8KJ5yaD6nd2aCeGGweT+DI dFCuEkckS3GUxktXQwkK5gp7LEz+mHA3C2XF52BsIOIJpAJHnKmszKK5Jin8fSnBnBzA jz4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.127.211 with SMTP id ni19mr240223igb.40.1441314660539; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.181.137 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 16:11:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAA5F1T1d9TOHMBGB=9qLPWibnyoFB4GefGkoMYcWENoZ6GJdFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Basavaraj Patil <bpatil1@gmail.com>
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013c5aee59e8a9051ede382f
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netext/zpWhdEEhK4je0F64Vp_dMLEzCHw>
Cc: "netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <netext-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [netext] Poll: Regarding the flow-mobility WG I-D
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netext/>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 21:11:02 -0000

Hello,

We would like to do a quick poll on the I-D: Proxy Mobile IPv6 Extensions
to Support Flow Mobility <draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob>

Current status of this I-D: Expired (as of Aug 29th).

The flow mobility I-D proposed : "extensions to the Proxy Mobile IPv6
protocol that are

   required to support network based flow mobility over multiple
   physical interfaces"


Question to the WG:

How relevant is this work and this extension to the protocol at this phase
of the PMIP6 protocols lifecycle?

Should we standardize this extension or simply drop it.

Standardize it [  ]
Drop it    [  ]

Your feedback is appreciated. Please respond by 9/11/15.

Rgds,
-Chairs


-- 
Basavaraj Patil