minor changes to the netfax rfc
Clifford Lynch <CALUR%UCCMVSA.bitnet@uccvma.ucop.edu> Wed, 26 August 1992 20:19 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07255; 26 Aug 92 16:19 EDT
Received: from NRI.NRI.Reston.Va.US by IETF.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07249; 26 Aug 92 16:19 EDT
Received: from stubbs.ucop.edu by NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17996; 26 Aug 92 16:21 EDT
Received: by stubbs.ucop.edu (5.57/1.34) id AA02598; Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:38:42 -0700
Message-Id: <9208261938.AA02598@stubbs.ucop.edu>
Received: from UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU by uccvma.ucop.edu (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 0582; Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:33:58 PDT
Received: from UCCMVSA.BITNET (CAL$UR) by UCCVMA.UCOP.EDU (Mailer R2.08) with BSMTP id 7063; Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:33:58 PDT
Received: by UCCMVSA.BITNET Wed, 26 Aug 92 12:33:52 PST
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 1992 12:33:52 -0800
From: Clifford Lynch <CALUR%UCCMVSA.bitnet@uccvma.ucop.edu>
To: NETFAX@stubbs.ucop.edu
Subject: minor changes to the netfax rfc
I got a couple of suggestions from the folks at the CMU mercury project about RFC 1314 (the image transmission format) which I would suggest that we consider incorporating into any subsequent revision. They have some considerable experience now with network image retrieval/display, and looked at the RFC in the context of some actual library-type applications. first, evidently TIFF lets you stick the image file directory anywhere; it need not be at the front of the file. By convention, it usually, is, but not always. We should consider requiring it at the front of the file so that programs processing these things know what they are dealing with prior to having to buffer the whole image. second, for random access applications (eg image databases) things are frequently stored as one TIFF object file for each page (either as files or database records). I think we might want to be less strong about our suggestion of using single large multipage TIFF files and suggest that this choice will be driven by the context of the specific application. I don't recall if this RFC is technically standards-track or not, but if it is we should get some logical revision points which would let us incorporate these changes if people think they are a good idea. Clifford Lynch
- minor changes to the netfax rfc Clifford Lynch
- Re: minor changes to the netfax rfc Stuart Lynne