working group
"Mark H. Needleman" <mhn@stubbs.ucop.edu> Sun, 01 August 1993 19:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15878; 1 Aug 93 15:06 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15870; 1 Aug 93 15:06 EDT
Received: from stubbs.ucop.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13502; 1 Aug 93 15:06 EDT
Received: by stubbs.ucop.edu (5.57/1.34) id AA07001; Sun, 1 Aug 93 11:51:27 -0700
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 1993 11:44:39 -0700
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Mark H. Needleman" <mhn@stubbs.ucop.edu>
Subject: working group
To: netfax@stubbs.ucop.edu
Message-Id: <Pine.3.02.9308011139.G6951-b100000@stubbs.ucop.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Folks Im writing for a couple of reasons. One I went to a presentation at the Amsterdam IETF on an experiment in remote printing being organized by Carl Malamud and Marshall Rose that is described in RFC1486 that basically allows you to mail things to print and fax gateways and uses the dns to address fax machines in a way that was one of the things we had talked about in the working group - i thought I should make folks aware of this if they were not already. Also I want to get a sense of who if anyone has implemented the RFC1314 format - If there have been some implementations I would like to get it advanced to full standard status This also brings up the question, especially now that this printing experiment is going on of wether it is time to reactivate the working group to try and move forward on some of the issues we were unable to get consensus on before. One possibility would be to see how the experiment that Carl and Marshall are running goes and then try to standardize some stuff based on the work that they have done What do people think? Mark Needleman University of California
- working group Mark H. Needleman
- Re: working group Larry Masinter