Re: [Nethistory] Collecting the history of networking, a possible methodology

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Thu, 23 May 2013 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265DE21F93D1 for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wh77CE7ZFt7K for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22b.google.com (mail-pb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4869321F93BC for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ma3so2830391pbc.30 for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=zKQzI1spSh/4M8fWKRnJISC568/ce7OmGoSzzHYaAB8=; b=JoIwjBICrxe3OALCl6n8wNpsA2YSJmDwM84G/V31AA+bwnFZhaU+BUiwIqbgPcSVZd AXtHqFOqLJJlfJ9FoI1BuLmIdLroGE0jc7qWPD9OEbu1U6dK82S7sJOfNv9UQqQmH+NU UdrKlykUJO7y3RuJTVR8d130u5l0o4RQhvlZM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=zKQzI1spSh/4M8fWKRnJISC568/ce7OmGoSzzHYaAB8=; b=g3BdPeaaBPZdXDLPbNB0/Aa36VjOhVedXx6pIz7DuOQ6RMY/SNnJKOjiZswYs+Q4gO t6c4e6ecRe29PRemNQh4ccokjZsx0Auod7TT89fHkrTePoBHgFv3Foriuu0WazUw54O4 Gqr6Kk6LvKK+aebJSzif42xYn30Koebrn/kZb7xSJDQx6gRnhjGjp4Mr5DxN+j3GIyVw qEDCSN3hfPGKgFjoW1D0cydllRRCFYUwV4fCeI99C8ujry9e6MGrG0WBGQ40GfTu88ul LmIk37dWDEAVv/4ImXFGB8uYjgiYUxRofCGozNAgPa0pD9aPNNJBhXQHfTbUxLy1KY++ 1S3g==
X-Received: by 10.68.228.195 with SMTP id sk3mr12459141pbc.103.1369311040942; Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:4900:1042:100:75e7:3af2:f4:fbbe? ([2001:4900:1042:100:75e7:3af2:f4:fbbe]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sg4sm11550429pbc.7.2013.05.23.05.10.39 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 23 May 2013 05:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
In-Reply-To: <519E00B4.5080600@internet2.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:10:36 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C5D33F76-1014-4945-BAE7-C7E580C1B108@hopcount.ca>
References: <2F1D9541-67A5-4EB7-BA3C-3C8DABC07606@earthlink.net> <519E00B4.5080600@internet2.edu>
To: Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJbFdk2WUMX95vy5EMQSW3NwcSoMlcDLfQWujfEy29fug3rduY1vNCrxMJJoLtzZFzI+Qp
Cc: Elizabeth Feinler <feinler@earthlink.net>, nethistory@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Nethistory] Collecting the history of networking, a possible methodology
X-BeenThere: nethistory@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Matching net historical materials with institutions that may preserve them <nethistory.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nethistory>
List-Post: <mailto:nethistory@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:10:42 -0000

On 2013-05-23, at 07:42, Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu> wrote:

> Jake, this feels very top-down.  There are already a dozen attempts at
> Internet history.  In other areas we've found that everyone has their
> own way of doing things, and attempts at unification are likely to fail.
> I suggest that instead of unification you try for federation -- find a
> way to include existing attempts, and not require them to reorganize.

I made a brief presentation at a NZNOG meeting in Hamilton a few years ago entitled "The History of Peering in New Zealand". One entertaining hour later (NZNOG is good for audience participation) there were two or three people who volunteered to start a wiki based on the notes they had taken during the session. The wiki subsequently became a free-form repository for facts and anecdotes. InternetNZ later commissioned a book based (in part) on that material.

(The book was kind of governance-heavy and missed a lot of the operational war stories that I found more entertaining.)

This to me seemed like a good approach to Internet history: the anarchic commons free-edit with no pretension of journalistic integrity; the resulting pile of clues provides a basis for actual research.


Joe