Re: [Nethistory] Need a change

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 04 January 2019 04:16 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EE4130F14 for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 20:16:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9vwn70YDnRRp for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 20:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x129.google.com (mail-it1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8510130E3F for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Jan 2019 20:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x129.google.com with SMTP id z7so170489iti.0 for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 20:16:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z/XUeA2Jg+/VA/Isk+5yNdYYCETTHuUuJSQ6pP7xMUk=; b=u5YmFq9FeZ+dA5i4OlxaX/lD9uVi2n6YC58LZVe0az7phll9UqACYmv0/FStgHE6WO NXw1FE1wOImllsijxqDcWab7bAEqWculkxLpkKXdwcsn+wG7rbW5ViGaUiIZ9lArP5kW R8tDRiH7StQphZ7LTEliLVgy0+cilCAXVxgqH0li/TGAevJ4vq1EIeSoZx0IICdaAwwT UkuESL178MjDBgfL96BGb+wINM4x0zsK4HA2EYYbsXwLeut0UXXK1OaKWKXxBJyXVCh7 otEL7UP13D3zLdnAd2lF15ADXc9SPWYT7Pr3gD6HG33GJ5I6blHyAGXroRtHFIlM8zFd 8cOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z/XUeA2Jg+/VA/Isk+5yNdYYCETTHuUuJSQ6pP7xMUk=; b=ikTLxc3cG/P4vRr/7AikT4oJlj+4OmFsaDkfUEZgseKXUqOLquIV9rbq4h0RFE4aA1 FLu5bdcRhLERRPM2hjQmunipT/BtlMf4fxDeVVKTr9nU4rXDEdqBxMXMavNiaMrvySlO PK+UIY0mseyODKruTpBTTWWsCCg9LsRLCCOC6WrxdC8EW3/PmKgvA+92xp/wvkUSDrZc 59cMMvAUDsWcr0Hw+Nga24Pac9F6B51lJRESOtNtb+4jCmqAt7IVwHNow3qdfwq6l94f gQGEyehJT5MW4ixratTkSENfTwFg1WwoiD42y9vS/2TvChJmS/kCtTBypjWhrdHvrDv4 Q8GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYZobcCk64RItiGHwx0okX2/tRgXrORa0fRQ4lKx46YwnIL/9j1 WiO0z/azAQ0oN7QBFG9a4QdKgRR/7/SMy1dK3Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XytauIkhWsH6PySwQvDf1i8o01GxbrpHYFPdW/SXtyMwtvfhL1egmY7GctArIvYe6CWeZqJI3kwzE8SkdpEtg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:960e:: with SMTP id c14mr35139878jai.84.1546575370835; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 20:16:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <585D8550-E15D-4CE5-AB43-C1C49DA233E3@earthlink.net> <CAHZk5WdmJK9Jb0-a+CSk+Gx27bPcHmNn87ThLwB_T2mgPz41vg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1901030818390.87828@ary.qy> <616ac103-736a-e64e-cb6a-6c3ee0dae9ae@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <616ac103-736a-e64e-cb6a-6c3ee0dae9ae@gmail.com>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 23:15:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP8vc81jHPestayLpO1jACc0ah3Mm63UVKCHQez=d42YRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>, Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0@gmail.com>, Elizabeth Feinler <feinler@earthlink.net>, nethistory@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000098dfaf057e9a23fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nethistory/83vjUu_59-lFHNHlmYlB5LMK72E>
Subject: Re: [Nethistory] Need a change
X-BeenThere: nethistory@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Matching net historical materials with institutions that may preserve them <nethistory.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nethistory/>
List-Post: <mailto:nethistory@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 04:16:13 -0000

Brian, what would you propose happen here? This list will not achieve
critical mass (although I now remember the launch fondly). Take it to ISOC?

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 8:22 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>; wrote:

> The only thing is, do we (for some value of "we") care about this?:
>
> >>> raise the awareness of IETF members about saving important historical
> archives and artifacts.
>
> If we close the list, we're saying either that we (the IETF) don't care, or
> that IETF people are already aware of the need to save stuff.
>
> I do care, because I've worked a bit on the history of computing and I'm
> very
> much aware of the historical value of personal records, alongside official
> sources. But whether this is worthy of IETF cycles is a separate question.
> It seems like something that should perhaps be an ISOC topic.
>