Re: [Nethistory] Measuring the Internet: When History Means Measurement

[Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>]

Dear nethistory,
public-webhistory &
public-informationarchitecture,



Thank you for your "terms of references" (how you use the term "outage" and
information sources deserve to notice).

The "Measuring the Internet" above is part of 2020 Internet Society Action
Plan Projects":


"2020 Action Plan Projects

Let us know which projects you’d like to be involved in!

No matter if you are an individual member, a Chapter/SIG administrator or
an organization member, we would like to hear from you. Follow the
instructions belowand update your profile".



https://www.internetsociety.org/action-plan/2020/projects/








Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Minggu, 02 Februari 2020, Curtis Villamizar <[e-mail]>
menulis:

> Good luck with that.
>
> ISPs have always been notoriously somewhat secretive about their
> network topology, even more secretive about the capacity of their
> network, and extremely secretive about the actual traffic loads.
>
> Attempts to document all Internet outages (you wrote shutdowns - wrong
> word) over time may prove even more difficult.  Small outages are a
> constant occurance and not even worth noting.  Routing errors can be
> vexing for end customers because they are persistent and can be missed
> by ISPs (and can be caused by ISP misconfiguration).  Any such outage
> is often attributed to just the organization that reported the outage
> or identified the problem even though the impact might have been
> widespread.  These days there are also IPv4 vs IPv6 outages (an outage
> exists for one but not the other) often due to a routing error.
>
> There was good information collected on the NSFNET when that was a
> thing and somewhat central to most of the Internet, but that is now
> ancient history (and not a complete look at the Internet even back
> then).  Check with Merit for archives and the IMR.  Also check CAIDA
> to see what they have.  You may find useful information on routes
> going away from the route view servers and possibly archives.  Some of
> the regional NOGs or NICs produce route churn graphs and may have
> archives.  There are many sources of information and many
> methodologies for collecting and analyzing it.
>
> As the number of ISPs grows the difficulty in determining level of
> network traffic becomes increasingly intractable.  When routes go away
> (or harder to detect blackhole or loop) it is hard to know how much
> traffic is affected.  Not all prefix outages are equally important and
> the number of addresses within the prefix is a poor estimator (almost
> useless for IPv6 with many ISPs freely handing out /48s).
>
> Whenever you talk about outages, you need to quantify the extent of
> the outage.  Small outages are a constant.  You have to decide what is
> a big enough outage to count as significant and then even harder you
> have to decide on a way to measure extent of outages.
>
> Curtis
>
>
> In message <CAKi_AEuZB-ekP+UAiz+f7ZJcGPss5dXFsY0HgccdPyWtVUAgj
> [e-mail]>
> Guntur Wiseno Putra writes:
> >
> > Dear nethistory,
> > public-webhistory &
> > public-informationarchitecture
> >
> >
> > * Measuring the Internet: When History Means Measurement
> >
> > It is about a "reliable place to find answers to questions about the
> > current state of the Internet... (but at the same time it is about
> > attempting historical values as it is also about a)... single site or
> tool
> > that brings together the multiple measures required to understand the
> > Internet=E2=80=99s evolution and health.
> >
> > ..... A Web-based dashboard will present these trends and contextualize
> > indicators within an overall narrative of Internet evolution and
> promotion
> > of the Internet way of networking...".
> >
> >
> > It is part of the 2020 Internet Society Action Plan Projects
> >
> > https://www.internetsociety.org/issues/measurement/
> >
> >
> > Regard,
> > Guntur Wiseno Putra
>