Re: [Nethistory] The Internet, Architecture, Governance, Technical Work and Net History: A Speci

[Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>]

Dear Hesham and All,

The update "The Architectural Guidelines" (2002) --which I missed before--
was made to propose such an extension of "Architectural Principles of the
Internet" (1996) as the latter considered complexity (control) in relation
with the Internet in large scale...

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3439.txt


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra


Pada Senin, 22 April 2019, Hesham ElBakoury <[e-mail]>
menulis:

> I think you meant RFC1958 which is updated by RFC3439.
>
> Hesham
>
>
>
> *From:* Architecture-discuss [mailto:[e-mail]]
> *On Behalf Of *Guntur Wiseno Putra
> *Sent:* Monday, April 22, 2019 6:41 AM
> *To:* [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> *Subject:* [arch-d] The Internet, Architecture, Governance, Technical
> Work and Net History: A Speci
>
>
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Of the question "What is the Internet Architecture?" mentioned in the
> earlier message:
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian. E. Carpenter's text "RFC 1985: Architectural Principles of the
> Internet" mentioned about Internet protocols and their design: May this
> links helpful to get arrived there at related archives ( as the text did
> not use any online source but suppposedly paper ones as references)...:
>
>
>
>
>
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/search?name=
>
>
>
> - https://www.rfc-editor.org/
>
>
>
>   Here are  menus "Internet Standard", "Official Internet Protocol
> Standards", and "advanced search".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regard,
>
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
> Pada Senin, 22 April 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <[e-mail]>
> menulis:
>
> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Individuals, or collectifs of individuals, are in an age of the Internet.
> It is such a presence may be approached and sensed by many ways --even when
> one said that s/he had just eat a food which a receipt was gotten by
> communicating by the Internet..
>
>
>
> Among others there are presences of "the Internet Architecture", "Internet
> Governance and Technical Work" and "Net History" as they represent
> interest-based mailing lists. How could one get arrived into those matters
> (together) --such a programmatic readership/learning: as sources and
> concepts have history and discources collectives/net... ? Should we imagine
> about information sources by making such a readership based on the linkage
> between the three...? Thus we may say about "The Internet Architecture,
> Governance and Technical Works: a Net History" (to say "A Net History in
> Terms of The Internet Architecture, Governance and Technical Work)...?
> --there would be a discourse map on the special readership which is about a
> co-presence of mailing lists...? --as one may use search engines of each
> mailing list for related interests...?
>
>
>
> To make an engagement with the programme should we go with such tentative
> journeys considering parts of the special readership...?
>
>
>
>
>
> For example:
>
> By considering the reasoning above:
>
>
>
> To the question on "What is the Internet Architecture?" we may refer to
> (archival) sources
>
>
>
>
>
> "RFC 1958: Architectural Principles of the Internet"
>
> (Carpenter, Brian E. Ed, IAB, 1996)
>
>
>
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1958
>
>
>
>
>
> (Note:)
>
> It was a snapshot record of the principles of the Internet Achitecture
> intended for general guidance and general interest...
>
>
>
> It was updated by RFC 3439...
>
>
>
> Both the concept "Internet Architecture" and the document RFC 1958 have
> history bringing readers to other relevant sources... They supposedly also
> give suggestions to come to broader or other conceptual discourses on
> "governance and technical work"
>
>
>
>
>
> Regard,
>
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
>