Re: [Nethistory] Collecting the history of networking, a possible methodology

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 23 May 2013 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A3511E813F for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VpW+0UFSCklM for <nethistory@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFF011E8132 for <nethistory@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4NFHS92016466; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1369322255; bh=Wg823iztISnQX2uR92y/NvMs9VrjF1NQ3MF/1Dg6Czw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=muo6EqGizHLOOhdvCHPA7K0x5WSQ/70YNjjU60rPkx9wbZGixNMwEM4nqZ2rSTXdm T4XUmgXLRgWm5NrNdIZixl5lMr5kvaWoV2njJHppglxAscu4tRrKpcoENRxgT7scMw CITVciMj/tueFH5tKTMEDegICAWvgaXGipbx+eRE=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1369322255; i=@resistor.net; bh=Wg823iztISnQX2uR92y/NvMs9VrjF1NQ3MF/1Dg6Czw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=QoHD9Na/hKNbgkEVCjJknwcc9w5JTfODaV4HfRR0PgvlNpObMWRvls1UFtNLrvuz4 XTlRQe8vLq2jn/AzTz3F9PZm20ApeyaaO9FX9T2je6R8IsLqH3zH0E3azoFtltBa50 xyvNa0RZMyxpplWJsE7DKfA17Xsarjhhm+Vy4Il4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130523080242.06dd24c8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:12:13 -0700
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, Scott Brim <swb@internet2.edu>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <C5D33F76-1014-4945-BAE7-C7E580C1B108@hopcount.ca>
References: <2F1D9541-67A5-4EB7-BA3C-3C8DABC07606@earthlink.net> <519E00B4.5080600@internet2.edu> <C5D33F76-1014-4945-BAE7-C7E580C1B108@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: Kilnam Chon <chonkn@gmail.com>, Elizabeth Feinler <feinler@earthlink.net>, nethistory@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Nethistory] Collecting the history of networking, a possible methodology
X-BeenThere: nethistory@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Matching net historical materials with institutions that may preserve them <nethistory.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nethistory>
List-Post: <mailto:nethistory@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nethistory>, <mailto:nethistory-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 15:17:45 -0000

At 05:10 23-05-2013, Joe Abley wrote:
>I made a brief presentation at a NZNOG meeting in Hamilton a few 
>years ago entitled "The History of Peering in New Zealand". One 
>entertaining hour later (NZNOG is good for audience participation) 
>there were two or three people who volunteered to start a wiki based 
>on the notes they had taken during the session. The wiki 
>subsequently became a free-form repository for facts and anecdotes. 
>InternetNZ later commissioned a book based (in part) on that material.
>
>(The book was kind of governance-heavy and missed a lot of the 
>operational war stories that I found more entertaining.)
>
>This to me seemed like a good approach to Internet history: the 
>anarchic commons free-edit with no pretension of journalistic 
>integrity; the resulting pile of clues provides a basis for actual research.

The approach mentioned above looks practical.  I suggest using it as 
a starting point instead of a top-down approach.

Regards,
-sm