[netlmm] Issue: Auth Option support

Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com> Tue, 07 August 2007 07:03 UTC

Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIJ6G-0004hC-Dh; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:03:28 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIJ6F-0004h7-EM for netlmm@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:03:27 -0400
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IIJ6F-00068L-40 for netlmm@ietf.org; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:03:27 -0400
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Aug 2007 00:03:26 -0700
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAAO2t0arR7PE/2dsb2JhbAA
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.19,227,1183359600"; d="scan'208"; a="12359211:sNHT11552730"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (sj-core-3.cisco.com [171.68.223.137]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7773QMk022021 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:03:26 -0700
Received: from irp-view13.cisco.com (irp-view13.cisco.com [171.70.120.60]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l7773QkF025758 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 07:03:26 GMT
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:03:26 -0700
From: Sri Gundavelli <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: netlmm@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0708062314130.13701@irp-view13.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0708070000100.13701@irp-view13.cisco.com>
References: <46B72367.2010600@nomadiclab.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0708062314130.13701@irp-view13.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=615; t=1186470206; x=1187334206; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=sgundave@cisco.com; z=From:=20Sri=20Gundavelli=20<sgundave@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Issue=3A=20Auth=20Option=20support |Sender:=20; bh=aGKrjcDKY7xbdH9xuH27/axBAmGZnE1gJZeChMBBoD8=; b=dJeHfNHEg7h3SVSykNsGejBZnHkYWvrkpmWw3uChssPDj6ncVunqBOv6QvqsLXnc7VSe3xpJ vowaC/6EtHmt3PUuQXxqqMbMxkzj1jUJwAyNAEGAPkIFoA9SdJkuz2sj;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=sgundave@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Subject: [netlmm] Issue: Auth Option support
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

This issue was opened by Alper Yegin.

The issue was related to the use of MUST clause in specifying
the IPSec requirement for Proxy Mobile IPv6 protocol. Alper
was suggesting that we relax that requirement and potentially
leave a room for Auth Option support in future.

But, as most people agreed and as supported by Jari, this can
always be changed in future when the support for new security
mechanisms such as Auth Option are defined for Proxy Mobile IPv6
and that specific document can always modify this requirement.
So, no changes will be made to the document on this issue.


Regards
Sri

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm