Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 15:52 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A223A68F8 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.313, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8JjbvHxH+9b for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.216]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F9E23A681D for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2178 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Sep 2010 15:52:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1284479557; bh=0vy1BZbZMRRvuEfw9ktfbX+bUa7HcP0l/1NKAtbhmMs=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rxRjCcUEo/K5BAbBS6Ta9M3QWbD1xy7/o70iMXEPfKM85ePaLFC0lt6U+nv0G7wQqF8+VMy3vJsbNGcBCXWN2c1BE/JwWom/cy7Ssj9Ltnoe1jBESTAJ1IxfJMzyjmNSywfEpiBVmu66dt6gGhn9jLRrFcRCdr0fsy4ZpXPksgY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=0VmJ98gPlRHmGh8DZs/tlvAZLaZLycQsA6dy84+Eb7dUq4sZZ9pegeFuJdV3OR5EO1E8sulfQvj5EgCvoTFIZKMdCYJ1l1LHHq+fgW9DSo9WlT+7ZntB7X2Rc3ok70cgdK/zep9V5CBC1zOLsOUld8+eqROBzVp7Ac/zT2jW7C8=;
Message-ID: <47245.1688.qm@web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: yKuaauYVM1m5UeXrFdixirYRD0F84Be.dkunz5saY5ehwEG hWBLqt7eyya.s_RYH.YCLJTC..UusJVl2aDjeGxVBCsROBlwYFX52y6akD7k JqIA77ut0sRTIZ3_E8eiukLXtsuxKudnxsR9y7QD27zS9ioCkbPQDbv.Dxgz iyoqiCgqPhECVgUP8S_H6ChJqsAA_BCjI9rTWnUPIWUS2h2SyJXQJRftXfeW A8OaJ1XvmQ9tHpah9jqUXPJCLMvNCzNX0omShK1s1n5tyUSSgdwO6.6No66t gWCIqed5I5O4DlfiO_TLcFHr.jWKuF.rvFPA2hypqv243AjFH6ZaSYna6oZU KCZ2m9JW03HHctklQ9T7KVsvtKwJC5V_j2K1cHTo-
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:36 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950
References: <20100913094506.6B51C3A6954@core3.amsl.com> <890653.19874.qm@web111402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4C8EF580.7070700@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 08:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Vijay Devarapalli <dvijay@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C8EF580.7070700@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:52:12 -0000

----- Original Message ----
> From: Vijay Devarapalli <dvijay@gmail.com>
> To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
> Cc: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>om>; jouni korhonen 
><jouni.nospam@gmail.com>l.com>; netlmm@ietf.org
> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 11:09:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt
> 
> On 9/13/10 3:49 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > Hi Jouni,
> >     Thanks for updating the draft.
> > Reading it I noticed that in  Section 3.3on Constructing the LMA FQDN from a
> > Service  Name
> >
> >
> >
> > can you please mention a service name in  QNAME format:
> > "_pmip6_ipv6.example.com"
> > where example.com can come from MN's  NAI or the operator domain.
> 
> No, PMIPv6 is not a service. So we shouldn't  do this.

Why not? mip6 IS a service name. We do need pmip6 service name as well, don't 
you think?

Also reading the draft's Section 3.3 on service name (Constructing the LMA FQDN 
from a Service Name to be precise), it totally sounds like a 3GPP document.
Remember this is IETF work. IETF defined DNS and PMIPv6. 
IETF can define a service name which is operator and SDO independent. If such a 
service name is defined, there is even no need to standardize it in other SDOs 
like 3GPP. Operators can use it immediately.


Cheers,

Behcet