Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG?
"Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)" <Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 11:24 UTC
Return-Path: <jonne.soininen@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D303A6A29 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHFcxUPUZ40g for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA2F3A6A35 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8ABOc8O023094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:24:38 +0200
Received: from demuexc023.nsn-intra.net (demuexc023.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.36]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8ABOa0T012258; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:24:38 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc023.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:24:26 +0200
Received: from 10.144.25.236 ([10.144.25.236]) by FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.28]) via Exchange Front-End Server webmail.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.36]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:24:25 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:24:24 +0300
From: "Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)" <Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com>
To: Vidya Narayanan <vidyan@qualcomm.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "netlmm@ietf.org" <netlmm@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C8AFF018.B81B1%Jonne.Soininen@nsn.com>
Thread-Topic: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG?
Thread-Index: ActPL9vJWTKsSNOQRE2IN966/NHT1gAVZyJQAFVQEM0=
In-Reply-To: <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B91E9B2A302E@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2010 11:24:26.0214 (UTC) FILETIME=[B9E5F860:01CB50DA]
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG?
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:24:14 -0000
Hello everybody, I agree with Vidya. It is time to close the WG. I think we could take the last update of the LMA discovery and then close the whole thing down. Cheers, Jonne. On 9/8/10 9:42 PM, "Vidya Narayanan" <vidyan@qualcomm.com> wrote: > Hi Jari, > I think closure of the NETLMM working group is overdue. I agree that we can > continue taking the lma-discovery document to completion even after the WG > closes. > > Thanks, > Vidya > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netlmm-bounces@ietf.org] On >> Behalf Of Jari Arkko >> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 1:28 AM >> To: netlmm@ietf.org >> Subject: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? >> >> All, >> >> I am looking at the work that the group is doing, and two of its >> documents are hopefully soon approved as RFCs: >> >> - mip-interactions (waiting on 2 ADs to clear their discusses) >> - pmipv6-mib (going to MIB doctor review) >> >> Seven other documents have already been published as RFCs, including >> the >> key base specifications. There is one more document that the group is >> working on, lma-discovery, but progress on that seems slow. I was >> wondering if it would be time to declare success and close the working >> group. The remaining document could either die if there's no interest, >> be AD sponsored to an RFC, or moved to NETEXT WG which is already >> working on similar topics. >> >> Thoughts? Comments? >> >> Jari (who is having a WG cleanup day) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netlmm mailing list >> netlmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm > _______________________________________________ > netlmm mailing list > netlmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Siemens Networks Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: jonne.soininen@nsn.com
- [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Jari Arkko
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? jouni korhonen
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Jari Arkko
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Soininen, Jonne (NSN-FI/Espoo)
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Dirk.von-Hugo
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? jouni korhonen
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Jari Arkko
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Narayanan, Vidya
- Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG? Jari Arkko