Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8193A6A35 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tpzcvwlC47Jj for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FA33A69FE for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz9 with SMTP id 9so7807888bwz.31 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=3cwWFvQJL3OW79aq8zdbOlnVOwVWaKwLSgRsogKDLyI=; b=kB/L5Y3xS+sVcLXt3qUhEmi2PEBIbmZ/QURPm4JDukfNTbc+/M0tkME2vzE0HnJkHX J+gF4t5tnF7sw/tnET0H6STZbFBpG1JbTXOuFXSt3VsEe3innSYFL6CNypc7t+g4H5I5 Bayi5CDbe3FSslMlPVCRTx6ObQH6IAthz0Vd8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=bhb/MqnHczs7wf9WNERuoeWItfinkNfhBqkkmAzWUebcUvlSJp0KsfutAiyGmp8YDb zpa+tpOxZnJjJ50l/tsq/w9e4ovPjx6tuxVpheJrqO9Myri6W5CaRiGAe8k68dgse8OE 1cmcBUDhW6vBOMdF4CSgu4Wsd3cbLoaSxSO9A=
Received: by 10.204.82.130 with SMTP id b2mr181711bkl.12.1284482598455; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a88-112-206-221.elisa-laajakaista.fi (a88-112-206-221.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.112.206.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x19sm365700bkv.9.2010.09.14.09.43.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <47245.1688.qm@web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:43:27 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CE4ECD0E-F23F-4FB3-9CDB-BF33C46FCE23@gmail.com>
References: <20100913094506.6B51C3A6954@core3.amsl.com> <890653.19874.qm@web111402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4C8EF580.7070700@gmail.com> <47245.1688.qm@web111415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:43:31 -0000

Hi Behcet,


On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Vijay Devarapalli <dvijay@gmail.com>
>> To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
>> Cc: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>om>; jouni korhonen 
>> <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>om>; netlmm@ietf.org
>> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 11:09:36 PM
>> Subject: Re: [netlmm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-netlmm-lma-discovery-05.txt
>> 
>> On 9/13/10 3:49 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>>> Hi Jouni,
>>>    Thanks for updating the draft.
>>> Reading it I noticed that in  Section 3.3on Constructing the LMA FQDN from a
>>> Service  Name
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> can you please mention a service name in  QNAME format:
>>> "_pmip6_ipv6.example.com"
>>> where example.com can come from MN's  NAI or the operator domain.
>> 
>> No, PMIPv6 is not a service. So we shouldn't  do this.
> 
> Why not? mip6 IS a service name. We do need pmip6 service name as well, don't 
> you think?
> 
> Also reading the draft's Section 3.3 on service name (Constructing the LMA FQDN 
> from a Service Name to be precise), it totally sounds like a 3GPP document.
> Remember this is IETF work. IETF defined DNS and PMIPv6. 

I assume you did not notice the references that were given as examples in Section 3.3? They totally seem to point in 3GPP's general direction.

> IETF can define a service name which is operator and SDO independent. If such a 
> service name is defined, there is even no need to standardize it in other SDOs 
> like 3GPP. Operators can use it immediately.

IETF can.. but does not have to. I like the current content of Section 7. For the record, the 3GPP boat has already sailed. Not much to do there.

- Jouni

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> 
>