[netlmm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5213 (3141)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 28 February 2012 21:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netlmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9648A21E805D for <netlmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.429
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YD2WeIbZqAws for <netlmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD3C21E805B for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 09999B1E002; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:30:03 -0800 (PST)
To: sgundave@cisco.com, kleung@cisco.com, vijay@wichorus.com, kchowdhury@starentnetworks.com, basavaraj.patil@nokia.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jonne.soininen@nsn.com, vidyan@qualcomm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120228213003.09999B1E002@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:30:03 -0800 (PST)
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [netlmm] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5213 (3141)
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:35:36 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5213,
"Proxy Mobile IPv6".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5213&eid=3141

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>;

Section: 8.2

Original Text
-------------
As per this specification, the following mobility options are
      valid in a Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message.  These options
      can be present in the message in any order.  There can be one or
      more instances of the Home Network Prefix options present in the
      message.  However, there cannot be more than one instance of any
      of the following options.

         Mobile Node Identifier option

         Home Network Prefix option

         Handoff Indicator option

         Access Technology Type option

         Timestamp option

         Mobile Node Link-layer Identifier option

         Link-local Address option

Corrected Text
--------------
As per this specification, the following mobility options are
      valid in a Proxy Binding Acknowledgement message.  These options
      can be present in the message in any order.  There can be one or
      more instances of the Home Network Prefix options present in the
      message.  However, there cannot be more than one instance of any
      of the following options.

         Mobile Node Identifier option

         Handoff Indicator option

         Access Technology Type option

         Timestamp option

         Mobile Node Link-layer Identifier option

         Link-local Address option

Notes
-----
There can be more than one instance of Home Network Prefix option so the list should not contain Home Network Prefix.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5213 (draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-18)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Proxy Mobile IPv6
Publication Date    : August 2008
Author(s)           : S. Gundavelli, Ed., K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury, B. Patil
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network-based Localized Mobility Management
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG