Re: [netlmm] FW: a qtn on pmipv6 multi-homing

> In this paragraph, Does multiple-interface mean multiple
> Proxy-care-of-addressess? Would someone throw some light on this?

A mobile node with multiple interfaces, lets say LTE and WIFI, attaches to
two different access networks one over LTE to MAG-1 and the other over WiFI
to MAG-2. In this case, there would be two Proxy Care-of Addresses, two MIP
tunnels and two MIP sessions/BCE's. Each of those MAG's will have security
relation to the LMA/PGW.

Sri

On 6/7/10 2:48 PM, "Sam Jeyaseelan" <Sam.Jeyaseelan@jdsu.com> wrote:

> forwarding to the correct forum....( i guess)..
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sam
> Jeyaseelan [Sam.Jeyaseelan@jdsu.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 2:58 PM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: a qtn on pmipv6 multi-homing
> 
> As per the section 5.4 from rfc 5213:
>      ...
>      ...
>      When a mobile node connects to a Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain through
>       multiple interfaces for simultaneous access, the local mobility
>       anchor MUST allocate a mobility session for each of the attached
>       interfaces.  Each mobility session should be managed under a
>       separate Binding Cache entry and with its own lifetime.
> 
> In this paragraph, Does multiple-interface mean multiple
> Proxy-care-of-addressess?
> Would someone throw some light on this?
> 
> thanks in advance.
> 
> -Sam
> 
> 4G R&D engineer
> JDSU
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm