Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG?

jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Wed, 08 September 2010 13:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netlmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC203A68E6 for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y7HK+cLnHafM for <netlmm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9647E3A68C4 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 06:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so16186eyd.31 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=GdxwJXa9AobUdoXMF9fXWFV6xyfBLEmBLycBMEF4J7k=; b=X/ppk3HwR0+Z7JR4wPXcFotGOb49CsOAE3mbLycumNLGKIGdcW7zysHadK+SIYVQXI 7IJHb5mzWJfA60aEluquyexz4JJsdSzEz/4xi2/ngtprWo9YqqpcoBGKPIH99CNB+lyB PTztoZ+17ZWyw7gbTGMm0bLImC7/KrjuP0qtE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=DIuVLpX99DpKiNDoFYT4V2lB02W7FXKiYkNyuFmA0tpPOYquO64sEhh/rXMpPhRgdq iIvecRNNJYZF8DYfCCVioqm3nIeg+aYIPdRaK4AoOEVHRHIDULoDdMI3tVuXR+5Iyens 2B6vRDft6/OwV/ooxlHXP2VlNjYNiEHFHbujQ=
Received: by 10.216.137.101 with SMTP id x79mr4553033wei.48.1283952071646; Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.4.66.211] ([77.226.244.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o15sm14702wer.39.2010.09.08.06.21.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: jouni korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C87492D.60108@piuha.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:21:14 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B7B3393C-E7B9-4ACD-AEDC-AE4E8FF66234@gmail.com>
References: <4C87492D.60108@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Cc: "netlmm@ietf.org" <netlmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Closing NETLMM WG?
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:20:46 -0000

Hi,

Regarding lma discovery.. I am currently putting in your comments (i.e. cutting text out). So that should be done as well any time soon.

- Jouni


On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:

> All,
> 
> I am looking at the work that the group is doing, and two of its documents are hopefully soon approved as RFCs:
> 
> - mip-interactions (waiting on 2 ADs to clear their discusses)
> - pmipv6-mib (going to MIB doctor review)
> 
> Seven other documents have already been published as RFCs, including the key base specifications. There is one more document that the group is working on, lma-discovery, but progress on that seems slow. I was wondering if it would be time to declare success and close the working group. The remaining document could either die if there's no interest, be AD sponsored to an RFC, or moved to NETEXT WG which is already working on similar topics.
> 
> Thoughts? Comments?
> 
> Jari (who is having a WG cleanup day)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm