IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Update & today's DT meeting

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE48120139 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=hChzwfT1; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=cjrxQ2rr
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CufHc49-ftrE for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49F9B120134 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 06:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13574; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1557410023; x=1558619623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=biyq/PaeyT1Msu4kHY7Mg75aazrMiGkn30tC9+P2c00=; b=hChzwfT1oSrkmTEWZh4ml5HUQXyarh1iGn02kPbmptDPEXHFX8O+WXsh I2XOaZa4AeZJ0BA8xpw93KZGb0muwQqhCbYh4g833zpL9P/NJXwSZQDN0 kk1PNtM6rqfh0OcvnFercQkMA/RzUHNfPyKnNMCxIiPY1e905B1rx2REO Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:SJQ4GxTn7/3ypXTo5z9fB92iHdpsv++ubAcI9poqja5Pea2//pPkeVbS/uhpkESXBdfA8/wRje3QvuigQmEG7Zub+FE6OJ1XH15g640NmhA4RsuMCEn1NvnvOjYlHcBeU1lN9HCgOk8TE8H7NBXf
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BKAACfL9Rc/5FdJa1kHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBUQcBAQsBgQ4vKScDaVUgBAsoCodOA4RSiiuCV5JYhE2BLoEkA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAoIIIzQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQRtHAELhUoBAQEEEhsTAQE4DwIBCBEEAQEvMh0IAQEEEwgagwGBHU0DHQECojYCgTWIX4IggnkBAQWFAhiCDwmBMgGLTheBQD+BV4IXNT6ERoM6giaLT4ZZlSEJAoIJkm+CEIo1iRSMJYEhk1YCBAIEBQIOAQEFgU84gVdwFYMngg+BJAEIgkKKU3KBKY1CAYEgAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,450,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="471051589"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 May 2019 13:53:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (xch-rcd-013.cisco.com [173.37.102.23]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x49Drg59016236 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:53:42 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 9 May 2019 08:53:41 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 9 May 2019 08:53:40 -0500
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 May 2019 08:53:40 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Rl324kmRT1pB5ouUjSCTQZBaKNbsWh+4xaZUVMuOMVY=; b=cjrxQ2rrjLtS4Ug01CcHlA8XY94d44E6rP0/9UgIq9S9GYDIGoqL4r13sMwpycqwkjBIXBiKWotfA7k3q5Hkwn8hzySS4Zn1r2rcIwdbinx4f5eSgCbQBt2+fe1/xDzRV1qa7Wq+d5gA++Aq6xwHXOoULBbbr+j/nrVTNkWSXW0=
Received: from BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.227.28) by BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.227.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1856.11; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:53:39 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3089:f0c1:d7f9:2b52]) by BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3089:f0c1:d7f9:2b52%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1856.012; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:53:39 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Update & today's DT meeting
Thread-Index: AdUA7ICcQCw7J0SOSLq/pvH58/b1PAFgHraw
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 13:53:38 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB263103927B254D1726099369B5330@BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <52c66ea6bad044f78f4af259b30b4a4f@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <52c66ea6bad044f78f4af259b30b4a4f@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.51]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: bbe9e649-f5aa-4c71-35d0-08d6d485bd7e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB2631;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB2631:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB2631D24E500CF53EB4B45AD7B5330@BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 003245E729
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(51444003)(199004)(189003)(5660300002)(14444005)(256004)(6246003)(53936002)(6436002)(6916009)(15650500001)(478600001)(7736002)(9686003)(7110500001)(71190400001)(54896002)(316002)(81156014)(81166006)(8936002)(68736007)(6306002)(2906002)(229853002)(71200400001)(3846002)(6116002)(790700001)(2501003)(2351001)(33656002)(55016002)(8676002)(73956011)(52536014)(86362001)(66066001)(486006)(14454004)(25786009)(99286004)(102836004)(446003)(186003)(11346002)(2420400007)(26005)(7696005)(76116006)(476003)(76176011)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(5640700003)(66476007)(66946007)(74316002)(6506007)(53546011)(61000200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB2631; H:BYAPR11MB2631.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: wNFVY3/LpVKNn2PlnLH8AxjNcbE8Ai3FjNmObzqwRc1T+6A5azBAT1GNG5RzxBbU4r2kZ4TqMtpzYJjZekGPyJk/FlRi/Y+s+LOdtveRRWoYcqqXVNTu6RB0vYsbVyamkVay56eju61Loyi0rFmR2qtcZxd8e4g9ZerlSQ5rnQnMnM4hjGlUTnHQ2E+iJF/MOjOgRYWZrataJolQF7eV1fxWn/FTPH3nsNJHrTYUgz8FhotEjgRZIaY0M33v7fAaoJcgOwSks6oFq0VJwNd5zgC+CmU3fH40eY3NmKiZLawyFetS2ssARJG4ghlGaC/tRmF5/dGNeXaFk/N6Ei0GlB6IobOmCWDdlvfAZzkGzrimk0w168VtDywFCQIANv7Wa3k3KXOTL1FL+t6WSivdJ8KumF6DR5Ycb1Ss0ZLCF68=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB263103927B254D1726099369B5330BYAPR11MB2631namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: bbe9e649-f5aa-4c71-35d0-08d6d485bd7e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 May 2019 13:53:39.2046 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB2631
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.23, xch-rcd-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/-G-J8dLczDccx_LKlNDmQph0Yug>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Update & today's DT meeting
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 13:53:46 -0000

I suggest that we continue the discussions today.

I've not had the opportunity to significantly update the documents over the last week, but I have pushed what I have so far to github.

Here are the brief notes that I took from last week:

2.1.1
- Perhaps describe these as updates to RFC 7950 rules.
2.1.2
- Do the examples provide any help here.  Or should they move to the guidelines, or do we need them at all?  Only clarifications of RFC 7950.

2.2
- Document needs to clearly indicate that it adds a new revision to the revision history.  Check what 7950 says on this.
- Text on how one determines the lineage.

2.3:
- Extension that hadn't been updated might break.
- Do we want a separate import statement, separate revision-label?

Examples:
  - Do we want to show a branch have an nbc change.
  - Add column, or marker, for nbc-changes.

3. Import by revisions:
- Do we allow a revision to import an older file that is not listed in the history?

Thanks,
Rob


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: 02 May 2019 14:40
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Update & today's DT meeting

I think that I'm making reasonable progress on refactoring (the base draft at least).

There is still work to do, but I have included where I am at, so folks can at least read and see if they think that this is heading in the right direction.

I'm still in the progress of moving the semantic versioning number scheme into a separate draft.

The whole draft is a bit rough, but areas that particularly still need work are:

  *   Fixing the import examples
  *   Guidelines.

I will set up the bridge for today for folks who would like to discuss, but I appreciate that nobody will have time to read it.  I can at least give a quick walk through explaining what I have done and why.

Thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email