[Netmod-ver-dt] Open issues that can be closed
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Thu, 19 September 2019 11:01 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0644412006D for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=KBM5erKO; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=isoYTgsk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cgWsCqV-nt7b for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2E9120033 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 04:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5878; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1568890859; x=1570100459; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=DStFHM3sJj+dEjoKZT2zRDfSmhEhepizswmZ1yTH/4g=; b=KBM5erKO3GWbx/rJCOtbtsqXak/RtGH3a9p8QKdbhl4G348utFApcEGf pRjH4/bWPAMzPTY2Wjw1O1e6LBvfmoylUVndnhTbzAxCtY+c2DS53c45b ift9FrD5PKkTLsX+3/zvjJIG9klzlVRDOcW6zlucjKNwAzYCN4ddMKyps g=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:fOwyXxOfQZjlkyf5yHkl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu60/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjhM//ucys8NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DEAgATX4Nd/5BdJa1lHQEBBQEHBQGBVQYBCwGBFS9QA21WIAQLKgqHXwOKfE2VJYRdgS6BJANUCQEBAQwBASMKAgEBhD8CgwMjNgcOAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FLQELhWMbEwEBOBEBgQAmAQQbEweDAYEdTQMdAQIMowUCgTiIYYIlgn0BAQWFDRiCFwMGgTQBjAgYgUA/gVeCHgEBg0sCgWMrgxCCJpUBJJdlCoIiA4cCjh6CNodLjyKOFogRkQACBAIEBQIOAQEFgVkGK4FCDghwFYMnUBAUgU6DcopTc4EpjioBgSIBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,523,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="341308458"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 19 Sep 2019 11:00:58 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8JB0wXO001937 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:00:58 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:00:58 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:00:57 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 06:00:57 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=DYOuAT7b/2v0THz71EI0eu10Un32Py+rg95ueSQcvW8mEF7ME6DmM5ta0K4IiiZ1iCPDOPnJsozR1Y3Ts0cCpCKqsCFvggKcj77FtUvQipi+1FFQwMUmM6V3oUB6CcnTaNSG7C7KYs7gzdMfmsyB6Q+5HKjhF6mP7LagzvAw9wsh6lySH9xxNtP+6P/mstUKncUJdgicchtTq0q7bVi6b3dqS6f/VmnKamEmWHCcUWVDgySlBN33aXxgRha6E696gNDcldknyL8ZgPqAcm+q2KqmS2s1d+ccnNBoSbNzWaXIHqRcum9tVdtHHJjwHto+jGzg6l6+UB7KracoekWF4Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HmyZCM1pYi4IjHeyX6z55vIFviJt6AHECDGYvm86FiQ=; b=ayYwm7JNoiV7D4VyEWs126qMTMNPWP0WX4r8lTht5BCltXSF7P7oEmPFSzmGdwCRMaklKp+0QuPzrUKgr8ym1kEWLHJIMfJhzTFirUoDjZ5dug4Hl8fEG6zm1xBWi866QaKMFw7M7AsSrva2z/VxTpc/ZZzeVXV471IdLMUVa65l9EvE/v2mqCVOx+bKCKSi0qAsbjkV0KBB77goB21nsSudgSk97AYXAQKxFyAuKmMKjo0+pro54xzPYenUW0/J7LawLs9DaQkZXzsf/bSzKD9ch/7razBnlR0+FmpOHz3a6E+xrYp/Uur0jbGl2HRFJzo/1//3JHm51g//UqsVWw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HmyZCM1pYi4IjHeyX6z55vIFviJt6AHECDGYvm86FiQ=; b=isoYTgsk4VTnt8uSujoaxr5kck1j97fPi+EOL6qsPxTBQfVG9qG0aF3cX/z3mMj4t0Nk8FAo9KWNO3y1mj+mKnKxNOUUDEYXAGgvxWdmqSCwjetn5Ngqx63X8i5dkQ/gaqOTA5R3CJxnpM34KWB2j8izq4iZGAvx8FYhiuH+Eac=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) by MN2PR11MB4384.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.37.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2284.21; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:00:55 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6db3:f4c:467b:30f6]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6db3:f4c:467b:30f6%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2263.023; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:00:55 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Open issues that can be closed
Thread-Index: AdVu2QORGNXp31kRRqaL8wc7Fxmdew==
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:00:54 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43661B9A9EA821A435559894B5890@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.61]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c7093f4a-e61a-4874-653d-08d73cf0a4ec
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600167)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB4384;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4384:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 5
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4384853C0E42D0007B5A9A15B5890@MN2PR11MB4384.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 016572D96D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(51444003)(199004)(189003)(3846002)(6116002)(33656002)(102836004)(6506007)(14454004)(99286004)(2351001)(7696005)(71200400001)(6916009)(71190400001)(52536014)(86362001)(64756008)(66446008)(66556008)(14444005)(256004)(76116006)(66946007)(66476007)(26005)(9686003)(236005)(6306002)(54896002)(5640700003)(55016002)(790700001)(186003)(6436002)(8936002)(486006)(2906002)(476003)(5660300002)(81166006)(66066001)(81156014)(606006)(8676002)(478600001)(25786009)(2501003)(316002)(966005)(7736002)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4384; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: KD3bgt07IeON+rHSIrXWWHYlwgXkvAzEGH6GLzNTyrrXmlmeUk3RDyGjU9h05T5Q4rhnkHX1qG7nskDvmyNP11EN7O7yDiDBr7S1UzxsVEjPs/ESakQMgdpj/1a/glsgHDBDd66KMkXEKhN04XadKoQnTJB4mNVdzhd9rIItKQQx/WcvsTivDfekUkpU61UaPY/1xuHP3GDsIGI4WX7ymoTb+Bsd3QzyFUcinlVuvJ50yHNPiut2l36SXEYtVn/SBYtf9YWDeE5EJ+KVR/NQNh1ooe/8s7ggcnTZpn5RkJwpfIsqhFBHT7+x7dA+K2d/MIyd8IZDoxILoKkdYhfFFYL3lXKKeEi0IEQ0AqQJNJzwywdnDFwWE+DDRv7eQQBXd8XAOmGL8d7ihJOVUVrheTevSY0AiMbrCsfES4/jZVU=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB43661B9A9EA821A435559894B5890MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c7093f4a-e61a-4874-653d-08d73cf0a4ec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Sep 2019 11:00:55.1139 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: FSlZbGDekIspL68pucpIJjtCrRDwni8No0Y5jtvq0G6cgjKsz+ZrTp6ooN48yaw47ORwVhAhHm9/q9tHQ7HDBw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4384
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/RLDYsFRqdDmB3ToDba-9PttdgzU>
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Open issues that can be closed
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:01:02 -0000
I propose close the following open issues: https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/20 Can "revision-label" be used in include? Resolution: this isn't allowed/required. Could be considered in a future version of YANG. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/21 Change typedef from "label-string" to "revision-label-string Resolution: change applied. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/18 How does a consumer know which versioning scheme is being used? Resolution: For revision labels that conform to the YANG Semver format this can automatically be inferred by the format of the label. For all other styles of revision-labels, I think that this is out of scope. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/9 The solution does not strictly extend semver 2.0.0 Resolution: Fixed by Joe, YANG Semver does now strictly extend Semver 2.0.0. https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/issues/7 Do we assume that a module has an implicit semver if none as been specified? Resolution: Close with no changes. A revision label is just an alternative name for a revision, so an implicit semver is no longer required. Please let me know if you have any concerns with the proposed resolutions. Thanks, Rob
- [Netmod-ver-dt] Open issues that can be closed Rob Wilton (rwilton)