IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 15 April 2020 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD16E3A0B30 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1O8HsmoYeLxM for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6C4C3A0B32 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493B91E065B for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:50:15 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id OkIpjuVM9N8ArOkIpjvxXw; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:50:15 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PpW9kTE3 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=cl8xLZFz6L8A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=HLvPDLHGFjgA:10:nop_election2020_name_subject a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=sIMwrE5wg-qMSlrF-JsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=lvNDOE9i95YA:10:nop_election2020_name_body a=-RoEEKskQ1sA:10:nop_election2020_name_body a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wh2SnDs1678kqB0YVc6DmMXQne0I0niX23FMO3XzAJ0=; b=u1AbP9xttROnckYK6Jlox2o+Vd d/WZMBxioM2EH+P/hBfJPV8hZ0bNq7NcwyLWZ9QHzgfqNd1DXV61WSkJmb0g5hwCu5QAg/hVs+iZx m2j4QqEK9Id7Vwc+TVK9hdzzC;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=11713 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1jOkIo-0021hl-To; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 09:50:15 -0600
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Cc: "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
References: <19562F9A-12CB-4A8D-8770-C565802DB585@cisco.com> <0100017161def02d-7bfa88b1-0457-4448-97f5-4cdb15a7313d-000000@email.amazonses.com> <MN2PR11MB436697DBE0E9F9FD4140312CB5DB0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Message-ID: <eb924eab-1d51-fed7-af05-58ec6c8440a8@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 11:50:09 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB436697DBE0E9F9FD4140312CB5DB0@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1jOkIo-0021hl-To
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:11713
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/mzlpnb8YE9dtd-eaL5-p7GHc1gQ>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 15:50:40 -0000

Rob,

     I have negative experiences with open side lists for specific WG 
topics -- basically the  list becomes so large that discussions that 
should take place on the WG list happen on the side list and end up 
including only those "in the know" -- in short I do object to having an 
open (to subscription) side mail list.

At this point I suggest using the standard document list expansions for 
authors discussions.  Wider discussions can be on the WG list.  We can 
also leave the DT untouched so that the archive remains and give folks 
time to transition to the new mode of working.

Lou

On 4/15/2020 5:04 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>
> I’ve also checked with Warren.  I had queried whether it would be okay 
> to create a separate alias for the authors.  He has no concerns but 
> also suggested just opening up the existing netmod-ver-dt (the 
> archives have always been public).
>
> Do the chairs have any objections to keeping the netmod-ver-dt alias, 
> making it open, and cleaning up the description to remove the design 
> team references?
>
> Thanks,
> Rob
>
> *From:*Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of 
> *Kent Watsen
> *Sent:* 10 April 2020 03:16
> *To:* Reshad Rahman (rrahman) <rrahman@cisco.com>
> *Cc:* netmod-chairs@ietf.org; netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG versioning meetings
>
> I think that it’s up to the authors now, but I have no issues with 
> scheduling a WebEx for you, if that’s what you’d like…is it?
>
> Separately, Rob was asking before about keeping the “netmod-ver-dt” 
> alias, which I also have no issue with.
>
> Co-chairs agree?
>
> K.
>
>
>
>     On Apr 9, 2020, at 5:16 PM, Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
>     <rrahman@cisco.com <mailto:rrahman@cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi chairs,
>
>     Now that VERDT is over, will you be scheduling a regular meeting
>     (inviting the WG) or is that up to the authors?
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Reshad.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netmod-ver-dt mailing list
> Netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email