IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4241200F7 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=RczVtW4z; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=qXdmRPHb
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XR-TXDkpdLTa for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D068C120125 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 09:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8030; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1571676663; x=1572886263; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=3aKXfWkGzZP2S6s6iRAacJU/eydq1hEbgIeMLGvKSKQ=; b=RczVtW4z9XSPhZ2n0gqKhoEvGMeiAAml8UeA2evDz9jzunCvWhtwUJmP 4MkRM/Q7nUcROsznD2+g6eRdIvJoKccUmtcLkNRsfSnj9KjK6+QoE1jDC FZeX7g4lZSngnXrc3tVspr6tofpHabJPi9GkdA2uACa71iJ//CItVutPD E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:MGIPPRUNo5uv0PafJn9v7CS+Cm7V8LGuZFwc94YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSA92J8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTFdE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtankgA8VGSFhj13q6KkNSXs35Yg6arw==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D8AQDe4K1d/5FdJa1lGgEBAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYF7gRwvKScFbFcgBAsqCodjA4pWTYIPkyGEYYJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIBAYRAAoMbJDgTAgMJAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFSwEBAQEDEhsTAQE4DwIBCBEEAQEoBzIUCQgBAQQBEggagwGBeU0DLgECpFICgTiIYYIngn4BAQWFCBiCFwmBNowPGIFAP4FXgh4uPoRHNIMMgiyVMJgrCoIkkEWEfII7L4cij0CEOol7mUYCBAIEBQIOAQEFgWkiKoEucBWDJ1AQFIMGgScBAoJJilN0gSmNNgGBIgEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,324,1566864000"; d="scan'208,217";a="647574989"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 21 Oct 2019 16:51:02 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (xch-aln-019.cisco.com [173.36.7.29]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9LGp2ud018550 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:51:02 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-019.cisco.com (173.36.7.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:51:02 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:50:44 -0500
Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 11:50:43 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=OPa3BJsfHgFcIkljcVRH3920Y3arOlZ+FLm6PV2I4QBU6t3egneDXCG+6mwDgEiyjUjRebUoMESxXJpBxwZ5Qr7OhEnYMXI6qEKrqq4yFIGQ31Ednhr4H2e+qBe3NJh8/3UKjtN7ApYUgsChmq3nwfLVO7k/pjLS+WyIx3h89QvNukT6lqRx/oUiqSeevYHW5Q33gIvu9rMd3HKK/lfLOJn872PDpboIsqntftQZSCiXmFROGkIZ52ZEqnKQTLq9KmFwgmUEzgzABil0XjDSJTuLzOX/n4jit/HdrMPryN0cRZakhrZLV7cLe5wm4JiLwAknMRD4FjSlwl55tDdPCg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qV5cyJrVuUIxLV57ASjIxGGRi5OgR4AqAMP1fxJ4oCA=; b=SLMxA3bLk8N6HoKHm0aD5VwEhF0Hnv6FsMnJavwzjfSEGojJBNQmRE4Ri74tjNtDldz2U7nKPMAPDuI6YOFXb/rKTL1TPIJkcvpiGCi2Rz62tSKXMsv8ePJeo8UFtaVaEZvmVSzab+uExHy++QlDKShePCi8ZdIui7SB03oltuHWlz2EOVlb6xKax8CQgLCxxlwbZu9D5Xz28Xiq+sdq1N3U4/461cKbJz7zQ/07GHIMVvHdwCN9BQZvgXt7+NUOaRDrMGrtz4M5amkTO4jSjlj8oRiY8HlQu28c6kr/b9GAJhOH71CTMYblByiYkfLeAs4xcyx83wL9qp7tVbj7Eg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=qV5cyJrVuUIxLV57ASjIxGGRi5OgR4AqAMP1fxJ4oCA=; b=qXdmRPHbIajvIGjohB76Ykz6kikSFFAceIqgD1BIIVmmqSXn2mjYzgV9nuWl4wosvuoB+0FZmHME+Cthws4VBOE241KLKEBeAxxVU78+kc589N4zV4nRjZkpbLjw9gye/1zEd9VjhIiQw5evu5fWiwK8ZJEr9D8CeJ48xn3dGf4=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.209) by MN2PR11MB4432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.39.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2347.21; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:50:43 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cca:41bd:b0bb:c549]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cca:41bd:b0bb:c549%2]) with mapi id 15.20.2347.029; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:50:43 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>, "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Packages review - parent vs previous
Thread-Index: AdWFJ0ZTblMWYKiWR6uSzLeRsjGYQADB261Q
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:50:43 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43668B3A2959D3C2C5CEB141B5690@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR07MB398167DB9402B420FC814B9D9B6D0@VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB398167DB9402B420FC814B9D9B6D0@VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.220.36]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 05990161-b7ff-462b-7a1d-08d75646cfdb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4432:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4432399112B2D8A6ECA48EACB5690@MN2PR11MB4432.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0197AFBD92
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(396003)(136003)(199004)(189003)(51444003)(110136005)(52536014)(99286004)(76116006)(66946007)(9686003)(296002)(2501003)(53546011)(6436002)(236005)(66446008)(64756008)(66476007)(66556008)(6306002)(229853002)(33656002)(54896002)(6246003)(102836004)(6506007)(66066001)(8676002)(14454004)(26005)(186003)(81156014)(81166006)(478600001)(9326002)(7736002)(790700001)(8936002)(71190400001)(71200400001)(256004)(6116002)(25786009)(14444005)(486006)(3846002)(5024004)(74316002)(76176011)(55016002)(5660300002)(11346002)(476003)(2906002)(7696005)(86362001)(316002)(446003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4432; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5RhcV0BR0sZn92kWRQ/T80eL3KYRRVLsQ/6KgVHpiVAwsmvllxNcefCLnukkBoNDZucslAuUZUXtaYTjgdX1kMHJZwAuYzz1twnd3Nk+lJLJAGADyPofKhQq5IDmqR0eJagykLQ9PRoWolqdGObCluITGXt32RO3OdJOHImbTsCY+MO5sik2O4bGu8Xp2xIjHpQjqxtNLCMcy3W/EZF+1o2jbYPk4uvKVdZgaNRVQmtHWEkNe+r9sTOyc5vEh6tjr0X/ach1khsSrRtjMLXJAc0tKzW7KSdr9kyk0pW/Qdz1Hm4HrFvWX1Zm5goWqv9cyAvIL5Rm8CD78uKhLPjPEF+jvcIqeWo2OF4rldigCkckfzoUExoTvirrPe73stUuitiVTHrg8jIOqNb+fqCDt2GwmcRPi/P+5Bm+/K1PGSFCe9s0zb/YHu/HlUL0Mx+4
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB43668B3A2959D3C2C5CEB141B5690MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 05990161-b7ff-462b-7a1d-08d75646cfdb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Oct 2019 16:50:43.0241 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: TM0kwpRkkzAucbXK/tFE3P4Ym4/YIkJzm8XPk6F+Ovh4MY9wcDkwALAriDy20J8l6JlsDiup8yRLt+UMrj9E8g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4432
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.29, xch-aln-019.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/pVD7b98pcQYKXb7chSYUjRbXbO8>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:51:22 -0000

Hi Jason,

I can't remember if this has been debated.  I think that parent version immediately makes me think of a tree of versions, but version lineage might also be fairly linear in many cases.

So, I'm happy to discuss this, but have a preference for 'previous-version', since it effectively just makes it a pointer (without regard to the structure).

Thanks,
Rob


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: 17 October 2019 21:13
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous

A minor thing I noticed is the use of 'previous'.

My preference is 'parent-version' rather than 'previous-version'. Was that already debated for the module versioning drafts?

Jason


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 9:58 AM
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG packages draft - now ready for review please

Hi,

I think that this document has had sufficient updates that it is ready for review.

The latest version is available at per the commit information above, or attached.

I appreciate that it is quite short notice, but if it is possible for folks to review and provide comments before Thursday's meeting that probably be helpful.

Thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email