Re: [netmod] intended status of the tree diagram document

Lou,

right now, the document says standards track, Martin's proposal was to
move to informational. So how do I parse "I think you are correct.  We
should leave as is."?

/js

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 07:36:58AM +0800, Lou Berger wrote:
> Martin,
> 	I think you are correct.  We should leave as is.
> 
> I'm sure Kent/the document Shepherd makes sure whatever we do is right
> before publication in any case.
> 
> Lou (as contributor)
> 
> On 11/15/2017 8:58 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has intended status
> > Standards Track.  I think I heard during the meeting today that it
> > ought to be Informational.  I think this makes sense.  It would then
> > imply that other standards track documents will have the tree diagram
> > document as an informative reference.
> > 
> > Should we make this change?
> > 
> > 
> > /martin
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > netmod@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>