Re: [netmod] ACL (-18) issues found during shepherd write-up

[Mahesh Jethanandani <[e-mail]>]

Kent,


> On Apr 25, 2018, at 6:18 PM, Kent Watsen <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Just a few minor things found while going through the shepherd checklist. These won't block the write-up, but should be fixed before we submit for publication.  For now, the write-up will explain that these will be fixed, and I'll clear these comments as soon as an update is posted:
> 
> 1) Obsolete normative reference: RFC 6536 should be RFC 8341

Updated.

> 
> 2) Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis has been published
>   as RFC 8343

Updated.

> 
> 3) Outdated reference: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams has been 
>   published as RFC 8340

Updated.

> 
> 4) some artwork has the comment "[note: '\' line wrapping for formatting
>   only]" even when there are no folded lines in the artwork.  [hint, 
>   only use the ",<column>" version of the INSERT macro for artwork that
>   you know contains a long line, or fix the macro to be smart enough to
>   only insert the header when needed]

Removed the note.

> 
> 5) it is good to see that now the 'reference' statements now follow the
>   "number: title" convention, but many of the "titles" are not the 
>   actual title of the referenced draft, as they should be.

The titles use well known acronyms like IPv6, TCP and ICMP. Anyway, I have expanded it to the full title.

> 
> 6) The document has examples using IPv4 documentation addresses according
>   to RFC6890, but does not use any IPv6 documentation addresses.  Maybe
>   there should be IPv6 examples, too?

Added an IPv6 example.

> 
> 7) I question if all the normative references are really normative. For
>   instance, RFCs 3688, 5246, 6020, 6241, 6242, 6536, 8040 stand out as
>   not needing to be normative.

Moved them to informative section with 6535 updated to 8341.

> 
> 8) Section 2, 1st paragraph: s/YANG/YANG 1.1/?

Done.

> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Kent
> 
> 

Mahesh Jethanandani
[e-mail]