[netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis

Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Wed, 06 November 2024 13:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153DDC18DBA6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 05:03:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Af6mWW9_A4uQ for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 05:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ECEAC18DB88 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 05:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Xk50Q1Ddjz6K7F7; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:00:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.201]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D86A14011D; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:03:09 +0800 (CST)
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.172) by frapeml100006.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:03:09 +0100
Received: from frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) by frapeml500007.china.huawei.com ([7.182.85.172]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 14:03:09 +0100
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Thread-Index: AQHbL323SoSZYkBNB0aAQNZAgK+1nbKoqlwQgAEl1NCAAGeDYA==
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 13:03:08 +0000
Message-ID: <189b48422af64148bb3cf9aa32e4af0a@huawei.com>
References: <DU2PR02MB10160E0626A79F0128A5F9BBC88452@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <dab6e745-987c-44b2-b484-a0a4e4af18a4@labn.net> <DU2PR02MB10160A5AA023021CAB5FF7E8C884C2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <SJ0PR14MB4792BA12C90CFBA1FF7DD934C34C2@SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB101604B69B5609657ED45FB2D884C2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <SJ0PR14MB47920236CA439CF253AA6E7BC34C2@SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB10160089CC6041B91F12FF34E884B2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <SJ0PR14MB479256A31313F8114F8F96B2C34B2@SJ0PR14MB4792.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB1016002270FE642C7DDD6CA6B884B2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <9293e7be-ea0f-4cdb-bad5-740f4fa84c4c@labn.net> <ZyoNp3zBgvISUSY-@alice.eecs.jacobs-university.de> <3addb1d3bae04d0a80ebee22790c1f65@huawei.com> <DU2PR02MB10160A04138C79494767EF89088532@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB10160A04138C79494767EF89088532@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=6ef28340-b023-4675-b3f1-b083657824ce;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2024-11-06T06:53:42Z;MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20;MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_ContentBits=0;MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Enabled=true;MSIP_Label_f47c794b-e3ab-43f0-9e0f-29fc3e503192_Method=Standard;
x-originating-ip: [10.48.147.185]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: 6JCIWC4C6OZHUAHQLM3CBMM4DYKAUEXS
X-Message-ID-Hash: 6JCIWC4C6OZHUAHQLM3CBMM4DYKAUEXS
X-MailFrom: Italo.Busi@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/0DxKAhzNBRnhGwU6oIhoSs64apE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Med,

IMHO, only the YANG code should be authoritative: the YANG tree should only be informative to help the readers.

I see some pressure to IETF community to speed up the standard process to deliver YANG models. IMHO, reducing the workloads to the authors would help in this direction.

What is the value of having tools if their output needs to be manually fixed?

Jurgen mentioned a tool that can automatically brake down diagrams: having this tool available to the whole community would be great

Italo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
> Sent: mercoledì 6 novembre 2024 07:55
> To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Jürgen Schönwälder
> <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>; Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> Cc: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org
> Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> 
> Hi Italo,
> 
> The guidance is actually building on existing ones in Section 3 of [RFC8340]
> (with one qualification about on where to put long trees).
> 
> One of the reasons I expanded the text rather than simple pointer to Section 3
> of [RFC8340], is to have a self contained section for the authors where to look.
> 
> BTW, pyang output is not authoritative and I encourage to review it. For
> example, pyang output for groupings with lists is broken!
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> > Envoyé : mardi 5 novembre 2024 13:25
> > À : Jürgen Schönwälder <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>;
> > Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> > Cc : Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org
> > Objet : [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> >
> >
> > By reading the current text in section 3.4, I am getting a bit
> > worried that we are increasing the workload of the editors of the
> > YANG models drafts
> >
> > While I fully agree with the initial statement, "YANG tree
> > diagrams provide a concise representation of a YANG module and
> > SHOULD be included to help readers understand YANG module
> > structure", I am wondering whether authors need to do more than
> > just copying the tree generated by pyang
> >
> > For example, splitting the output of pyang into smaller diagrams
> > requires editorial efforts and need to be re-done every time the
> > YANG model is updated during the draft development
> >
> > In some of the draft I have worked on, I have included some YANG
> > tree snapshots but regretted this because they quickly tend to
> > get out of synch during the draft development
> >
> > What would be the drawback to always require the full data tree
> > to be included into an Appendix, without introducing different
> > cases?
> >
> > Italo
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jürgen Schönwälder
> > <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>
> > > Sent: martedì 5 novembre 2024 13:21
> > > To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> > > Cc: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; netmod@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> > >
> > > Since RFCs nowadays came in multiple formats, we do not know
> > anymore for
> > > sure what a page is. The text and html renderings do not seem
> > to be paginated
> > > anymore, the pdf rendering still seems to have pages. The
> > canonical format
> > > seems to be the xml file, which has no pagination either.
> > >
> > > We should rely on good judgment of the authors, a SHOULD NOT
> > rule looks
> > > like bureaucracy winning over trust into authors to make
> > appropriate choices.
> > >
> > > /js
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 10:28:10AM +0000, Lou Berger wrote:
> > > > Med
> > > >
> > > > See inline
> > > > On 10/29/2024 8:20 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Re-,
> > > > >
> > > > > The new guidance:
> > > > >
> > > > > * characterizes what is long/too long tree
> > > > >
> > > > In yesterday's session you also mentioned that rfc8340 didn't
> > define
> > > > what a long/large tree is.  I think you must have missed it
> > in section
> > > > 3.3 of RFC
> > > > 8340: YANG Tree Diagrams
> > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Frfc%2Frfc8340%23section-
> >
> 3.3&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166a
> e4
> >
> 9a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%
> 7C
> >
> 638664100806701855%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwM
> DAiLC
> >
> JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=J
> > FhcfQiC3ypjhvrJOUO61Ige%2FOKAUEeQai3j4CISU90%3D&reserved=0> :
> > > >
> > > >    As tree diagrams are intended to provide a simplified
> > > >    view of a module, diagrams longer than a page should
> > generally be
> > > >    avoided.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this sufficient.
> > > >
> > > > > * recommends against including too long trees in the main
> > doc, while
> > > > > Section 3 of RFC8340has the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > When long diagrams are included in a document,
> > > > >
> > > > > authors should consider whether to include the long diagram
> > in the
> > > > >
> > > > > main body of the document or in an appendix.
> > > > >
> > > > so want to change the existing non-RFC2119 formulation
> > "should .. include ..
> > > > in an appendix" to "SHOULD NOT include in the main body of
> > the
> > > > document", is this correct?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Lou
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Med
> > > > >
> > > > > *De :* Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> *Envoyé :* mardi 29
> > octobre
> > > > > 2024 12:34 *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Lou Berger
> > <lberger@labn.net>;
> > > > > netmod@ietf.org *Cc :* Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>
> > *Objet :*
> > > > > RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> > > > >
> > > > > Med
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for this. The new doc says:
> > > > >
> > > > > > These guidelines take precedence over the generic
> > guidance in
> > > > > >  Section 3 of [RFC8340].
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you highlight what you see is the differences between
> > the new
> > > > > section and rfc8340? (In other words, why is a reference
> > saying
> > > > > authors should follow section 3.3 of rfc8340 insufficient?)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Lou
> > > > >
> > > > > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > > ----
> > > > >
> > > > > On October 29, 2024 4:25:44 AM mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     Hi Lou, all,
> > > > >
> > > > >     (1)
> > > > >
> > > > >     There are RFCs that don’t include the full tree, but
> > AFAIK there
> > > > >     is no RFCs that include a stable pointer for a tree.
> > There are
> > > > >     I-Ds under development that follow that option, but I
> > don’t think
> > > > >     this can be used as example as these are following what
> > was in
> > > > >     rfc8407bis.
> > > > >
> > > > >     (2)
> > > > >
> > > > >     I paused to reply with the hope to hear more voices
> > about this
> > > > >     issue. Till now, no one else indicated preference for
> > the stable
> > > > >     URL option.
> > > > >
> > > > >     With that, I prepared a PR to remove that option and
> > only leave
> > > > >     the appendix option.
> > > > >
> > > > >     The full diff can be seen at:
> > > > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > Fauthor-
> > tools.ietf.org%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-
> >
> &data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae4
> 9a2
> >
> ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
> 38
> >
> 664100806730122%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi
> LCJQI
> >
> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Hxg
> Z
> > jVYygwcP8VWH9I68YvHccEe8Z6huwBlKFqrSrV8%3D&reserved=0
> > > wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/draft-ietf-netmod-
> > >
> > rfc8407bis.txt&url_2=https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.c
> > om/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-wg.github.io%2Frfc8407bis%2Ftoo-
> > long-trees-
> >
> &data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae4
> 9a2
> >
> ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6
> 38
> >
> 664100806745673%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi
> LCJQI
> >
> joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8GCj
> > %2FKulj36AMYl%2Bca%2BmKxpLvrS42PaCjRwSdCZCNo4%3D&reserved=0
> > > bis/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 2Fauthor-
> > tools.ietf.org%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-
> >
> wg.gi&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a16
> 6a
> >
> e49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C
> 0%
> >
> 7C638664100806761930%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjA
> wMDAi
> >
> LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata
> > =6OjfnJAsoqVbAzqtvEUN93UyruW5essv7FQkEs%2FLvX0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > > thub.io/rfc8407bis/draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis.txt&url_2=https://ne
> > > > > tmod-wg.github.io/rfc8407bis/too-long-trees-bis/draft-ietf-
> > netmod-rf
> > > > > c8407bis.txt>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     Hope this captures the opinions heard so far.
> > > > >
> > > > >     Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > >     Med
> > > > >
> > > > >     *De :*Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> > > > >     *Envoyé :* mardi 22 octobre 2024 17:29
> > > > >     *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>;
> > > > >     Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; Andy Bierman
> > <andy@yumaworks.com>
> > > > >     *Cc :* Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>;
> > > > >     netmod@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org;
> > Jan
> > > > >     Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> > > > >     *Objet :* RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis
> > > > >
> > > > >     Med,
> > > > >
> > > > >     ----------
> > > > >     On October 22, 2024 8:22:47 AM
> > mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     > Re-,
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Can you please indicate why you think this is a bad
> > option? What
> > > > >     is the harm in recording an option that matches current
> > practice?
> > > > >     >
> > > > >
> > > > >     Is there an example of a published rfc that points to
> > the full
> > > > >     tree via a URL?
> > > > >
> > > > >     As far as I read the discussion, no one was agreeing
> > that this
> > > > >     approach was a good idea.
> > > > >
> > > > >     Thanks,
> > > > >     Lou
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >     > I remember that you indicated that you are using an
> > electronic
> > > > >     device to read docs. You can still browse the tree from
> > the
> > > > >     supplied URL.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Cheers,
> > > > >     > Med
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > De : Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
> > > > >     > Envoyé : mardi 22 octobre 2024 14:00
> > > > >     > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>;
> > > > >     Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>; Andy Bierman
> > <andy@yumaworks.com>
> > > > >     > Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>;
> > > > >     netmod@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org;
> > Jan
> > > > >     Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>; Kent Watsen
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
> > > > >     > Objet : RE: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Med,
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > ----------
> > > > >     > On October 22, 2024 1:21:31 AM
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>
> > > > >     wrote:
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >> Hi Lou,
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> Kent rightfully raised the point about the troubles
> > with long
> > > > >     trees that exceeds the max line thing. I also clarified
> > that, e.g.,
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > This is separate and unrelated topic, talking about
> > inclusion of
> > > > >     full trees in appendices as is currenty allowed for in
> > rfc8340.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >>   *   Existing specs have provisions for tree
> > diagrams to be
> > > > >     included “as a whole, by one or more sections, or even
> > by subsets
> > > > >     of nodes” (8340)
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Yes I'm familiar with that text :-)
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >>   *   There are RFCs out there that do not include
> > them.
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Sure, which is also allowed for in rfc8340
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >> This is a MAY after all. We can't mandate that every
> > doc MUST
> > > > >     include the full tree anyway. Are you asking for that?
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Absolutely not. I'm not quite sure what give you that
> > > > >     impression. I just would like to see the additional
> > option removed
> > > > >     as I think it is a bad idea.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > Thanks,
> > > > >     > Lou
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> Cheers,
> > > > >     >> Med
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >>> -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > >     >>> De : Lou Berger
> > <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net
> > > > >     <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>
> > > > >     >>> Envoyé : lundi 21 octobre 2024 23:38
> > > > >     >>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co
> > > m
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>>;
> > > > >     >>> Andy Bierman
> > > <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com%3cmailto:andy@yumaworks.com>>>
> > > > >     >>> Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani
> > > > >     <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> > >>;
> > > > >     >>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-
> > ietf-netmod-
> > > rfc8407bis@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf-
> > > netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     Jan
> > > > >     >>> Lindblad
> > <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; Kent
> > > > >     Watsen
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net
> > > > >
> > <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>>
> > > > >     >>> Objet : Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> Hi.
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> Looking at today's (-20) version of the document, I
> > still see
> > > > >     >>> stable pointers as an option.  I really don't see
> > the support for
> > > > >     >>> this in the overall discussion and I personally
> > think such is a
> > > > >     >>> *bad* idea.
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> I'd prefer that any references to the "stable
> > pointer" option be
> > > > >     >>> removed from the document.
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> Thanks,
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> Lou
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >     >>> On 10/15/2024 2:22 AM,
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>
> > > > >     wrote:
> > > > >     >>> > Hi Andy,
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> > RFC8340 leaves it to the authors to include it or
> > not. It uses
> > > > >     >>> statements such as "When long diagrams are included
> > in a document,
> > > > >     >>> .."
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> > An outcome of the discussion is that we can't
> > impose one option
> > > > >     >>> here. For example, the current situation is that we
> > do already
> > > > >     >>> have RFCs (RFC7407, RFC9182, RFC9291, etc.) that do
> > not include
> > > > >     >>> the full trees because these are too long, the
> > narrative text is
> > > > >     >>> good enough, the document itself is +150 pages,
> > etc. Also,
> > > > >     >>> including pages and pages of text that exceeds the
> > max line is not
> > > > >     >>> convenient for readers.
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> > The new guidelines include a provision for when
> > the full tree is
> > > > >     >>> not included for better consistency among published
> > documents.
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> > Cheers,
> > > > >     >>> > Med
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> >> -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > >     >>> >> De : Andy Bierman
> > > > >     <andy@yumaworks.com<mailto:andy@yumaworks.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:andy@yumaworks.com%3cmailto:andy@yumaworks.com>>>
> > > Envoyé :
> > > > >     lundi 14
> > > > >     >>> octobre 2024
> > > > >     >>> >> 18:24 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co
> > > m
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>>
> > > > >     >>> >> Cc : Mahesh Jethanandani
> > > > >     <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> > >>;
> > > > >     Lou Berger
> > > > >     >>> >> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net
> > > > >     <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>;
> > > > >     netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;
> > draft-ietf-
> > > netmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org
> > > > >
> > <mailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>; Jan
> > > > >     Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; Kent
> > > > >     >>> Watsen
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net
> > > > >
> > <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>>
> > > > >     Objet : Re: [netmod] WGLC on
> > > > >     >>> >> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >> Hi,
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >> IMO we do not need new procedures to save the
> > reader from a
> > > few
> > > > >     >>> extra
> > > > >     >>> >> pages of YANG tree diagram text.
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >> This is the only option that makes sense to me:
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >>     *  Include the full tree in an appendix.
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >> Andy
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 10:19 PM
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co
> > > m
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>>
> > > > >     >>> >> wrote:
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Hi Mahesh,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Yes, this refers to the main body per the
> > structure in
> > > > >     >>> >> rfc7322#section-4.
> > > > >     >>> >>> Updated accordingly.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> The diff is available using the same link:
> > Diff:
> > > > >     >>> >>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt - draft-ietf-
> > netmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> rfc8407bis.txt
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 2
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 252><ht
> > >
> > tps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%252
> > >
> > > > >     >>> >> Faut
> > > > >     >>> >>> hor-
> > > > >     >>> >> tools.ietf.org
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> > Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%
> >
> 7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f
> >
> 5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806792761%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e
> yJWIjo
> >
> iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7
> >
> C%7C%7C&sdata=VfNCeAL5MNmPRmZYSMuY2APsbuR%2FXbRYhC2TWipVpvg
> %3D&re
> > served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt
> >
> p%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40o
> r
> >
> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
> 4
> >
> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806808244%7CUnknown%7CTWFp
> bGZsb3
> > d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> > %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=yMttcTY8gRLF31qD4UK%2Bw3%2BNDp%2FiV
> hi%2FMk
> > 8%2FYXGlvvw%3D&reserved=0>%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dht
> > > tps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-
> > > > >     >>> wg.gi
> > > > >     >>> >>> thub.io
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Fthub.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a
> 8f
> >
> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7
> C
> >
> 0%7C0%7C638664100806824255%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM
> C4wLj
> >
> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7
> C
> >
> &sdata=TyRjiAesKMMSGJX5BUXymM1unzDMnvZSEYBVDleJDVA%3D&reserve
> d=0>
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Fthub.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a
> 8f
> >
> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7
> C
> >
> 0%7C0%7C638664100806839350%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM
> C4wLj
> >
> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7
> C
> >
> &sdata=LDY0a4Hv3bqgBGjSDgFbt1Eq%2BVjvrcjV6uG0I4djg0U%3D&reserved=
> > 0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> rfc8407bis.txt%26url_2%3Dhttp
> > > > >     >>> >>> s%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-wg.github.io
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> > F2fnetmod-
> >
> wg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
> Cc
> >
> 4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d2
> >
> 0%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806854954%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiMC
> >
> 4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7
> >
> C%7C&sdata=Sy9yOWcDBmeOtu3BcxAg5NWdvaLH9%2Fp%2B%2F4PdutN6ST
> s%3D&r
> > eserved=0><http://2fnetmod-
> > > wg.github.io/>%2Frfc8407bis%2Flong-
> > > > >     >>> trees%2Fdraft-
> > > > >     >>> >> ietf-n
> > > > >     >>> >>> etmod-
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > > rfc8407bis.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> %7C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806872719%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=MP1BKR1%2BEOHWN5ViuE%2BRJiUoQ0%2FvGDGrKrsiag3vqJo
> %3D&
> > reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=h
> >
> ttp%3A%2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%
> 40or
> >
> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
> 4
> >
> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806888862%7CUnknown%7CTWFp
> bGZsb3
> > d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> > %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GQG6iITz%2FV1bgRRbe3yiEjJzZQl1SbzbYmuH
> xTf9
> > GRA%3D&reserved=0>%7C3
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> >
> 60a053d61314c7851bc08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> > > 20
> > > > >     >>> >> %7C0
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> %7C0%7C638645198411517106%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
> 8e
> > > yJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> > > > >     >>> >> MDAi
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> >
> LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata
> > > =
> > > > >     >>> >> PUXU
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > FFa2G1oGYjtnRYtC9hFJkRu5Nx%2FISQob3izoYds%3D&reserved=0>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Thanks.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Cheers,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Med
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> *De :* Mahesh Jethanandani
> > > > >     <mjethanandani@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <mailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com%3cmailto:mjethanandani@gmail.com>
> > >>
> > > > >     *Envoyé
> > > > >     >>> :*
> > > > >     >>> >> samedi
> > > > >     >>> >>> 12 octobre 2024 01:54 *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed
> > INNOV/NET
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co
> > > m
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>>
> > > > >     *Cc :* Lou Berger
> > > > >     >>> >> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net
> > > > >     <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>;
> > > > >     >>> >>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-
> > ietf-netmod-
> > > rfc8407bis@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf-
> > > netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     Jan
> > > > >     >>> >> Lindblad
> > > > >     >>> >>> <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>; Kent
> > > > >     Watsen
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net
> > > > >
> > <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>>
> > > > >     >>> *Objet
> > > > >     >>> >> :* Re:
> > > > >     >>> >>> [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Hi Med,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Speaking as a contributor ...
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> On Oct 11, 2024, at 8:47 AM,
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>
> > > > >     >>> wrote:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Hi Lou, Kent, all,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Taking into account the feedback received so
> > far, I suggest
> > > > >     >>> the
> > > > >     >>> >>> following
> > > > >     >>> >>> change:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> OLD:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     YANG tree diagrams provide a concise
> > representation of a
> > > > >     >>> YANG
> > > > >     >>> >>> module
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     and SHOULD be included to help readers
> > understand YANG
> > > > >     >>> module
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     structure.  If the complete tree diagram
> > for a module
> > > > >     >>> becomes
> > > > >     >>> >> long
> > > > >     >>> >>>     (more than 2 pages, typically), the diagram
> > SHOULD be
> > > > >     >>> split
> > > > >     >>> >> into
> > > > >     >>> >>>     several smaller diagrams (a.k.a
> > subtrees).  For the
> > > > >     >>> reader's
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     convenience, a subtree should fit within a
> > page.  If the
> > > > >     >>> >> complete
> > > > >     >>> >>>     tree diagram is too long (more than 5
> > pages, typically)
> > > > >     >>> even
> > > > >     >>> >> with
> > > > >     >>> >>>     groupings unexpanded (Section 2.2 of
> > [RFC8340]), the
> > > > >     >>> authors
> > > > >     >>> >> SHOULD
> > > > >     >>> >>>     NOT include it in the document.  A stable
> > pointer to
> > > > >     >>> retrieve
> > > > >     >>> >> the
> > > > >     >>> >>>     full tree MAY be included.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> NEW:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     YANG tree diagrams provide a concise
> > representation of a
> > > > >     >>> YANG
> > > > >     >>> >>> module
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     and SHOULD be included to help readers
> > understand YANG
> > > > >     >>> module
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     structure.  If the complete tree diagram
> > for a module
> > > > >     >>> becomes
> > > > >     >>> >> long
> > > > >     >>> >>>     (more than 2 pages, typically), the diagram
> > SHOULD be
> > > > >     >>> split
> > > > >     >>> >> into
> > > > >     >>> >>>     several smaller diagrams (a.k.a
> > subtrees).  For the
> > > > >     >>> reader's
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     convenience, a subtree should fit within a
> > page.  If the
> > > > >     >>> >> complete
> > > > >     >>> >>>     tree diagram is too long (more than 5
> > pages, typically)
> > > > >     >>> even
> > > > >     >>> >> with
> > > > >     >>> >>>     groupings unexpanded (Section 2.2 of
> > [RFC8340]), the
> > > > >     >>> authors
> > > > >     >>> >> SHOULD
> > > > >     >>> >>>     NOT include it in the main
> > document.  Instead, authors MAY
> > > > >     >>> >> consider
> > > > >     >>> >>>     the following options:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> [mj] Not clear what you mean by “main
> > document”. Do you
> > > mean
> > > > >     >>> the
> > > > >     >>> >>> normative section of the document? If so,
> > please edit it to
> > > > >     >>> say
> > > > >     >>> >> that.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Thanks
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     *  Provide only a stable pointer to
> > retrieve the full
> > > > >     >>> tree.
> > > > >     >>> >> The
> > > > >     >>> >>> full
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>        tree is thus not provided at all.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     *  Include a note about how to generate the
> > full tree.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     *  A combination of the first and second
> > bullets.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     *  Include the full tree in an appendix.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> For convenience:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - Diff: Diff: draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis.txt -
> > > > >     >>> >>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 2
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%
> > 252><ht
> > >
> > tps://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%252
> > >
> > > > >     >>> >> Fauthor-
> > > > >     >>> >> tools.ietf.org
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> > Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%
> >
> 7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f
> >
> 5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806918991%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e
> yJWIjo
> >
> iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7
> >
> C%7C%7C&sdata=jTBhYuGiw%2Fot%2F4cGtpVSxSM7HkT3B%2FcvR6IRzblm2w
> A%3
> > D&reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url
> >
> =http%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%
> >
> 40orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40
> b
> >
> fbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806934052%7CUnknown%7CT
> WFpbG
> > Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI
> >
> 6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=trBrGAzFEGEIhfh4%2BPNs4Vjjd%2BXNn
> %2B0o
> > vwTL5arrozQ%3D&reserved=0>%2Fapi%2Fiddiff%3Furl_1%3Dht
> > > tps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> wg.github.io
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
> C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806949696%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=VxytcQup6rnh%2FZdw8zTKNomLIDj8mk4vrRxiZ6cOK58%3D&r
> ese
> > rved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%
> >
> 3A%2F%2Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40oran
> ge
> > .com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b
> 92
> >
> 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806964621%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> b3d8ey
> > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%
> >
> 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YjrpxzPL59hd0PEyhqgjVmVN5hNWKc2FVP1MwztkFT
> 4%3D
> > &reserved=0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Fdraft-
> > > ietf-netmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> rfc8407bis.txt%26url_2%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fnetmod-
> > > > >     >>> >> wg.github.io
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7
> C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806980907%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=86zhJlYv7u%2BrPmp%2BTsXMdRn%2BOxkbcEXX2VKcPqgHH50
> %3D&
> > reserved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=h
> >
> ttp%3A%2F%2Fwg.github.io%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
> or
> >
> ange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
> 4
> >
> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100806995782%7CUnknown%7CTWFp
> bGZsb3
> > d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> > %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2xF4EN8QJcX5rpTjAiSrV%2FdRHcw6gnWjZKB
> MhsnN
> > MOk%3D&reserved=0>%2Frfc8407bis%2Flong-
> > > trees%2Fdraft-ietf-netmod-
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > > rfc8407bis.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> > > > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> %7C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807010471%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=SsdXIpT81tZewnxw0uJjfqKIsV8qoG3kPsNuQ96nwbw%3D&rese
> rv
> > ed=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A
> > %2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40ora
> nge.c
> >
> om%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b92
> 53
> >
> b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807031840%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> d8eyJW
> > IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C
> >
> 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l46DAl8atRK2yRPhCwsu%2F54yT9aztTveEZL3qGIDEKg%
> 3D
> > &reserved=0>%7C360
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> >
> a053d61314c7851bc08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20
> > > %7
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> C0%7C0%7C638645198411540339%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi
> > > MC4wLj
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> >
> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7
> > > C&
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > sdata=68CtKMDgxzWjl4IsKqxJlSLpvOHAflb0Cv5TQFwExN0%3D&reserved=0>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - PR:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > F
> > > > >     >>> >> gith
> > > > >     >>> >>> ub.com
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Fub.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4a
> 8f5
> >
> a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C
> 0
> > %7C0%7C638664100807055898%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi
> MC4wLjA
> >
> wMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C
> &
> >
> sdata=KY1spdVRlh3ukyN06ph3gISPBzV%2Becgy0s6rgvRt69Y%3D&reserved=0
> > ><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%
> >
> 2Fub.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cc4
> a8f
> >
> 5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7
> C
> >
> 0%7C0%7C638664100807071783%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiM
> C4wLj
> >
> AwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7
> C
> >
> &sdata=QYf6v2qoioeM9Ox6IWkxtRuZzk9boKyANJueV6ewJyA%3D&reserved=
> 0>
> > %2Fnetmod-
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > wg%2Frfc8407bis%2Fpull%2F70%2Ffiles&data=05%7C02%7Cmoh
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> amed.boucadair%40orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> %7C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807090818%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=CvKlxRdy7CxnoLaEzKoXHjxj995wEoTwiyUEfasSN3k%3D&reserv
> > ed=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A
> > %2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40ora
> nge.c
> >
> om%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b92
> 53
> >
> b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807112214%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3
> d8eyJW
> > IjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C
> >
> 0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=C2zNv8IfYZBf7W%2FNiU9bC33XAo%2F2BqpSI7QbmRq
> dHBE%
> > 3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c7851bc
> > > 08dcec6c99f5%7C9
> > > > >     >>> >> 0c7a
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> 20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638645198411557810%7CUn
> > > known
> > > > >     >>> >> %7CT
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > WFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC
> > J
> > > > >     >>> >> XVCI
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> 6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2BkYIcnZV7Wwi4tUS6uOObRMUMcdt4
> > > xxyiNBOW
> > > > >     >>> >> QXGp
> > > > >     >>> >>> wE%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Better?
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Cheers,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Med
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> *De :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > > >     >>> >>> *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 octobre 2024 11:13 *À :*
> > 'Lou Berger'
> > > > >     >>> >>> <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net
> > > > >     <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>;
> > > > >     netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-
> > ietf-netmod-
> > > rfc8407bis@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf-
> > > netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
> > > > >     >>> <
> > > > >     >>> >>> jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>> *Cc :*
> > > > >     Kent Watsen
> > <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net
> > > > >
> > <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>>
> > > > >     >>> >> *Objet
> > > > >     >>> >>> :* RE: [netmod] Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Hi Lou,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - Keeping long trees in the main document
> > is really not
> > > > >     >>> >> helpful to
> > > > >     >>> >>>     digest a module. I also know by experience
> > that this
> > > > >     >>> raises
> > > > >     >>> >> comments,
> > > > >     >>> >>>     including from the IESG.
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - Keeping long trees that exceed 69 line
> > max in the main
> > > > >     >>> or
> > > > >     >>> >> as an
> > > > >     >>> >>>     appendix is really hard to follow.
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - There are already RFCs out there do not
> > include long
> > > > >     >>> trees,
> > > > >     >>> >> but a
> > > > >     >>> >>>     note about how to generate it. The
> > narrative text uses
> > > > >     >>> small
> > > > >     >>> >> snippets to
> > > > >     >>> >>>     help readers walk through the model.
> > > > >     >>> >>>     - Some consistency is needed in how we
> > document our
> > > > >     >>> modules +
> > > > >     >>> >> help
> > > > >     >>> >>>     authors with clear guidance (e.g.,
> > characterize what is a
> > > > >     >>> >> long
> > > > >     >>> >>> tree)
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> I’m afraid that we can’t simply leave the OLD
> > 8407 as it is.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> That’s said, I’m only the pen holder and will
> > implement
> > > > >     >>> whatever
> > > > >     >>> >> the
> > > > >     >>> >>> WG decides here.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Cheers,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Med
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> *De :* Lou Berger
> > > > >     <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net
> > > > >     <mailto:lberger@labn.net%3cmailto:lberger@labn.net>>>
> > *Envoyé :*
> > > > >     mardi 1
> > > > >     >>> octobre 2024
> > > > >     >>> >>> 13:37 *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.co
> > > m
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>>;
> > > > >     >>> >>> netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:netmod@ietf.org%3cmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org<mailto:draft-
> > ietf-netmod-
> > > rfc8407bis@ietf.org
> > > > >     <mailto:draft-ietf-netmod-
> > rfc8407bis@ietf.org%3cmailto:draft-ietf-
> > > netmod-rfc8407bis@ietf.org>>;
> > > > >     Jan
> > > > >     >>> >> Lindblad
> > > > >     >>> >>> (jlindbla)
> > <jlindbla@cisco.com<mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com
> > > > >
> > <mailto:jlindbla@cisco.com%3cmailto:jlindbla@cisco.com>>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> *Cc :* Kent Watsen
> > > > >     <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net
> > > > >
> > <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net%3cmailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>>>
> > > > >     *Objet :* Re:
> > > > >     >>> [netmod]
> > > > >     >>> >> Re:
> > > > >     >>> >>> WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Med, Jan, WG,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> I have to say that I read the discussion
> > concluding with to
> > > > >     >>> NOT
> > > > >     >>> >> change
> > > > >     >>> >>> the current recommendation, see
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > F
> > > > >     >>> >> mail
> > > > >     >>> >>> archive.ietf.org
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> > Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.co
> >
> m%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253
> b
> >
> 6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807140589%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
> 8eyJWI
> >
> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0
> > %7C%7C%7C&sdata=qsNMvTvkfOvGnRenMhLSwGgBOSWtX03vX6TVEou7X
> GQ%3D&re
> > served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt
> >
> p%3A%2F%2Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%4
> 0
> >
> orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bf
> b
> >
> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807156836%7CUnknown%7CTW
> FpbGZs
> > b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> >
> n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=I7PQXzYGTMNQfvIk15GrIYm4H%2FYzuVVoIJ
> vHpZ
> > 4CTps%3D&reserved=0>%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetmo
> > > d%2F0Q0YiyNi15V-
> > > > >     >>> Szzf5awLVh-
> > > > >     >>> >> 15_c%2
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
> %7C
> >
> c4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d
> >
> 20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807173045%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ
> WIjoiM
> >
> C4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%
> >
> 7C%7C&sdata=K9HTQS6eEvEHh0gI%2BanvbwXOFrdV7idWLzetVngUB2g%3D&
> rese
> > rved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%
> >
> 3A%2F%2F40orange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40or
> ange
> > .com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b
> 92
> >
> 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807192489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> b3d8ey
> > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%
> >
> 7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=D6QMha6Uy%2BWaRh%2BDKPWBt%2FG6RJ3%2BZYI
> asNLytR
> > UxlFY%3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c78
> > > > >     >>> >> 51bc
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> 08dcec6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C63864
> > > 519
> > > > >     >>> >> 8411
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> 573595%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2l
> > > uMzI
> > > > >     >>> >> iLCJ
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FuJbQGSOk7%2Fk
> > > MXATR
> > > > >     >>> >> 1fn3
> > > > >     >>> >>> YScP4MBfkRWYvYXz90NyNI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> I personally use an ereader (or computer) more
> > than paper and
> > > > >     >>> >> having
> > > > >     >>> >>> to go to a static URL -- probably when I'm off
> > line -- does
> > > > >     >>> NOT
> > > > >     >>> >> seem
> > > > >     >>> >>> like something we should be
> > recommending.  Furthermore, I'm
> > > > >     >>> not
> > > > >     >>> >> sure
> > > > >     >>> >>> what our process has to say about having the
> > HTML include
> > > > >     >>> *text
> > > > >     >>> >>> content* that is not in the text version.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Again just my perspective.
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> What do others think? do they feel strongly
> > that this change
> > > > >     >>> >> from the
> > > > >     >>> >>> current recommendation (in RFC8340) of having
> > long trees in
> > > > >     >>> >> appendixes
> > > > >     >>> >>> is a good or bad idea? (Yes, I'm in the
> > strongly against
> > > > >     >>> camp.)
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Thanks,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Lou
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> On 10/1/2024 4:24 AM,
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com%3cmailto:mohamed.boucadair@
> > > orange.com>>
> > > > >     wrote:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>> Hi Lou,
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>     1. The comment that triggered the change
> > and companion
> > > > >     >>> thread
> > > > >     >>> >> where
> > > > >     >>> >>>     this was discussed and changes proposed can
> > be seen at:
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>>
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > F
> > > > >     >>> >> mail
> > > > >     >>> >>> archive.ietf.org
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> > Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.co
> >
> m%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253
> b
> >
> 6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807218227%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
> 8eyJWI
> >
> joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0
> > %7C%7C%7C&sdata=PB4vsiUa8qxziZ7Ukkxl3TdYCYDtY0a8CYG6TxY4Dhg%3D
> &re
> > served=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=htt
> >
> p%3A%2F%2Farchive.ietf.org%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%4
> 0
> >
> orange.com%7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bf
> b
> >
> c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807236040%7CUnknown%7CTW
> FpbGZs
> > b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> >
> n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KbINQdJdgp1vtJFViA%2B7gXuGvSShxJeaetCl
> %2
> > FlP87Ws%3D&reserved=0>%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fnetmo
> > > d%2F-
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> b2HX0XUK49qJB19LHu6MC0D9zc%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada
> > > ir%40o
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>> range.com
> > > > >
> > >
> > <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2
> >
> Frange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C
> c4a
> >
> 8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%
> >
> 7C0%7C0%7C638664100807256811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjo
> iMC4w
> >
> LjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%
> >
> 7C&sdata=TtLqWyyWb%2BwejIBTL1Vnbw1F7bD1%2Bo8NNQjDxximv4A%3D&
> reser
> > ved=0><https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3
> >
> A%2F%2Frange.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.
> com
> > %7Cc4a8f5a166ae49a2ab4f08dcfd9da752%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253
> b6
> >
> f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638664100807277742%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8
> eyJWIj
> > oiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%
> >
> 7C%7C%7C&sdata=NOf%2FS%2BV%2BmVoo0kqY3sUbpt80WLS2itsKD1l4YGco
> t5A%
> > 3D&reserved=0>%7C360a053d61314c7851bc08dcec
> > > 6c99f5%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc4
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> 8b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638645198411584985%7CUnknown%7CTWFp
> > > bGZsb3d
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> > 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%
> > 3
> > > > >     >>> >>
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r4xdN4asqklRHaI%2BIixWX29CCw7i1QBlmAHlNXr
> > > Kjng
> > > > >     >>> >> %3D&reserved=0
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>>
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > _
> > > > >     >>> ____
> > > > >     >>> > ______________________________________
> > > > >     >>> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir
> > des
> > > > >     >>> informations
> > > > >     >>> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent
> > donc pas etre
> > > > >     >>> diffuses,
> > > > >     >>> > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous
> > avez recu ce
> > > > >     >>> message
> > > > >     >>> > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur
> > et le detruire
> > > > >     >>> ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> > electroniques etant
> > > > >     >>> susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute
> > responsabilite si
> > > > >     >>> ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie.
> > Merci.
> > > > >     >>> >
> > > > >     >>> > This message and its attachments may contain
> > confidential or
> > > > >     >>> > privileged information that may be protected by
> > law; they should
> > > > >     >>> not be distributed, used or copied without
> > authorisation.
> > > > >     >>> > If you have received this email in error, please
> > notify the
> > > > >     >>> sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> > > > >     >>> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable
> > for messages that
> > > > >     >>> have been modified, changed or falsified.
> > > > >     >>> > Thank you.
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > ___________________________________________
> > > > >     >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir
> > des
> > > > >     informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne
> > doivent donc
> > > > >     >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans
> > autorisation. Si
> > > > >     vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le
> > signaler
> > > > >     >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces
> > jointes. Les
> > > > >     messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > > > >     >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a
> > ete altere,
> > > > >     deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> > > > >     >>
> > > > >     >> This message and its attachments may contain
> > confidential or
> > > > >     privileged information that may be protected by law;
> > > > >     >> they should not be distributed, used or copied
> > without
> > > > >     authorisation.
> > > > >     >> If you have received this email in error, please
> > notify the
> > > > >     sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> > > > >     >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for
> > messages
> > > > >     that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> > > > >     >> Thank you.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > ___________________________________________
> > > > >     > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
> > > > >     informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne
> > doivent donc
> > > > >     > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans
> > autorisation. Si
> > > > >     vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le
> > signaler
> > > > >     > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces
> > jointes. Les
> > > > >     messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > > > >     > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a
> > ete altere,
> > > > >     deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> > > > >     >
> > > > >     > This message and its attachments may contain
> > confidential or
> > > > >     privileged information that may be protected by law;
> > > > >     > they should not be distributed, used or copied
> > without
> > > > >     authorisation.
> > > > >     > If you have received this email in error, please
> > notify the
> > > > >     sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> > > > >     > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for
> > messages that
> > > > >     have been modified, changed or falsified.
> > > > >     > Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > ___
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > >     Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
> > informations
> > > > >     confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> > > > >
> > > > >     pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans
> > autorisation. Si vous
> > > > >     avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> > > > >
> > > > >     a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces
> > jointes. Les
> > > > >     messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > > > >
> > > > >     Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete
> > altere,
> > > > >     deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> > > > >
> > > > >     This message and its attachments may contain
> > confidential or
> > > > >     privileged information that may be protected by law;
> > > > >
> > > > >     they should not be distributed, used or copied without
> > authorisation.
> > > > >
> > > > >     If you have received this email in error, please notify
> > the sender
> > > > >     and delete this message and its attachments.
> > > > >
> > > > >     As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for
> > messages that
> > > > >     have been modified, changed or falsified.
> > > > >
> > > > >     Thank you.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> > > ___
> > > > > ________________________________________
> > > > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
> > informations
> > > > > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre
> > > > > diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous
> > avez recu
> > > > > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur
> > et le detruire ainsi
> > > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant
> > susceptibles
> > > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message
> > a ete altere,
> > > deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> > > > >
> > > > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential
> > or
> > > > > privileged information that may be protected by law; they
> > should not be
> > > distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > > > > If you have received this email in error, please notify the
> > sender and delete
> > > this message and its attachments.
> > > > > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages
> > that have been
> > > modified, changed or falsified.
> > > > > Thank you.
> > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an
> > email to
> > > > netmod-leave@ietf.org
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jürgen Schönwälder              Constructor University Bremen
> > gGmbH
> > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen |
> > Germany
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list -- netmod@ietf.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to netmod-leave@ietf.org
> _________________________________________________________________
> ___________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
> message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this
> message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.