Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 25 September 2017 17:36 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05E0134515 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:36:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTdUPjpfvfNX for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3BC1320CF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-40-225.A165.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.40.225]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D8461AE02A7; Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:36:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 19:39:03 +0200
Message-Id: <20170925.193903.1777711656523405872.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: acee@cisco.com
Cc: lhotka@nic.cz, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5EEA5E2.C9623%acee@cisco.com>
References: <1505470900.18681.0.camel@nic.cz> <D5E153B9.C80CF%acee@cisco.com> <D5EEA5E2.C9623%acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/0FkexloKNb505TWJL0NAfTL0TG8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2017 17:36:52 -0000
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote: > Martin, Lada, et al, > > While I don’t think we need additional annotations that Joe had prototyped > (at least not as the default), I strongly believe we need to keep the ‘@‘ > and ‘/‘ in the tree output for schema mount. Can you explain what information "/" gives the reader? Compare these two trees: +--mp vrf-root +--rw rt:routing/ +--rw rt:router-id and +--mp vrf-root +--rw rt:routing +--rw rt:router-id What did the "/" in the first tree tell me that I don't see in the second tree? Then consider: +--ro if:interfaces@ and +--ro if:interfaces +-- if:interface@ and +--ro if:interfaces@ +-- if:interface@ Which ones are legal, and what do they mean? /martin While the former enhancement > provided details, the schema mount tree designations are every bit as > important as knowing, for example, whether or not a schema leaf is a > presence node. > > Thanks, > Acee > > > On 9/15/17, 9:56 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote: > > >+1 - Also it is hard enough to format the tree output to fit in a draft > >w/o further annotations (even with —-tree-line-length). > >Thanks, > >Acee > > > > > >On 9/15/17, 6:21 AM, "netmod on behalf of Ladislav Lhotka" > ><netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lhotka@nic.cz> wrote: > > > >>Andy Bierman píše v Čt 14. 09. 2017 v 08:43 -0700: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> Actually I liked the early pyang output that was concise and easy to > >>>remember. > >>> The current format gets very cluttered and there are too many little > >>>symbols > >>> to remember them all. > >> > >>I agree. > >> > >>Lada > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> Andy > >>> > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote: > >>> > I've been hacking on pyang, and I changed tree.py to add the enum > >>>values > >>> > for enumeration types and identiyref bases for identityref types. > >>>Here > >>> > is an example: > >>> > > >>> > module: yang-catalog > >>> > +--rw catalog > >>> > +--rw modules > >>> > | +--rw module* [name revision organization] > >>> > | +--rw name yang:yang-identifier > >>> > | +--rw revision union > >>> > | +--rw organization string > >>> > | +--rw ietf > >>> > | | +--rw ietf-wg? string > >>> > | +--rw namespace inet:uri > >>> > | +--rw schema? inet:uri > >>> > | +--rw generated-from? enumeration [mib, code, > >>> > not-applicable, native] > >>> > | +--rw maturity-level? enumeration [ratified, > >>> > adopted, initial, not-applicable] > >>> > ... > >>> > +--rw protocols > >>> > | +--rw protocol* [name] > >>> > | +--rw name > >>> > identityref -> protocol > >>> > ... > >>> > > >>> > My questions are: > >>> > > >>> > 1. Is this useful? > >>> > > >>> > 2. If so, can this be added to pyang (happy to submit a PR) and > >>> > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams? > >>> > > >>> > 3. What changes to the output format would you recommend? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks. > >>> > > >>> > Joe > >>> > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > netmod mailing list > >>> > netmod@ietf.org > >>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> netmod mailing list > >>> netmod@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > >>-- > >>Ladislav Lhotka > >>Head, CZ.NIC Labs > >>PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>netmod mailing list > >>netmod@ietf.org > >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > >
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree output Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Balazs Lengyel
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Joe Clarke
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… t.petch
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Lou Berger
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Yingzhen Qu
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] Proposal to enhance the YANG tree ou… Xufeng Liu