Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-04.txt

"Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com> Mon, 28 October 2019 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4421200A3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=JKi2LFZD; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=s1zxnV1/
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XptzQ_XdHUY9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4BB120098 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5145; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1572278238; x=1573487838; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=hMxa+f70HMjo9+VTjsuWX8lZybQ1oOj80qdp38SOGdc=; b=JKi2LFZDCuQGQNnKI/C56LJaY629UvUFQaefq1xDdxDer6CR44dqqz1r 9lFhbtWYvFTQFiIuwYrtDZyqG5dZ/Inw1yTHG3Xysud+5dKcLSrka9hu1 40z2JSn6tpjdfkChkGf0hSZhV0yACxnYWUdv6QU0O56vrXF71kIJDdtKL 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3A/v/d8xHC8GaPp0Bsso0p4J1GYnJ96bzpIg4Y7I?= =?us-ascii?q?YmgLtSc6Oluo7vJ1Hb+e4z1A3SRYuO7fVChqKWqK3mVWEaqbe5+HEZON0pNV?= =?us-ascii?q?cejNkO2QkpAcqLE0r+efzhayUgH8lqX15+9Hb9Ok9QS47z?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AgAAD9Drdd/5JdJa1lGgEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMBAQEBEQEBAQICAQEBAYFpAwEBAQELAYEbL1AFgUQgBAsqCoQeg0YDim6?= =?us-ascii?q?COZMvhGGBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBAS0CAQGEQAIXgzMkNgcOAgMJAQEEAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?FBG2FNwyFUgIBAxIRHQEBNQIBDwIBCAQ7AwICAjAUEQEBBA4FIoMAgXpNAy4?= =?us-ascii?q?BpXQCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgkmCRhiCFwmBNgGMDhiBQD+BOAwTgkw+hC6DJzK?= =?us-ascii?q?CLIlKhi+FPIk0jwMKgiSQTIRiG5laqAcCBAIEBQIOAQEFgVkFLYFYcBVlAYJ?= =?us-ascii?q?BUBAUgwYMFxWDO4pTdIEojh4BLl8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,240,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="352291947"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 28 Oct 2019 15:57:12 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (xch-aln-010.cisco.com [173.36.7.20]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9SFvB2Z014316 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:57:12 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 10:57:11 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:57:10 -0400
Received: from NAM04-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 11:57:10 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=AFb+ZaCRFiIFkgE3GD6l612FFxNaDGSfr3eHwWwQgwOqC+aZNSHPJ8n/5KoAsxQBHJkFMADoRtnZX4ee9CXZzgE+wNyVjnPblgq6sVpCYEn0GtGJCFhWP9Wjl6Pjdd0WO9wYCYzklVcvZtVgdRFAn+eBwK6GXNbFV2WGwLeWq9d1CfDntts4avXjtWTV0tIXHsXw9gAjqtB0Cd6y0kg47VZMYI1/crlTdWddnnWTXYUy78f5vdyLM4bK1DXktNLSqXQjkHZI/kcbR7CbPmmCqZeg9kSK7MSmwGkByIQRBWoK6Hoh1kPABiVnvpPYRIHW5VEHzlki+CyveW7zeE3wtA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hMxa+f70HMjo9+VTjsuWX8lZybQ1oOj80qdp38SOGdc=; b=SKOEWKZxQJ80lY1NNkKHaovmgrfbpgV93HD7XJ4AOEFHRS7XIA9hI7Docky12v8ZYCy5XsVxySjvO2wAVP4gRUHAzthStHYShJxaWrG3mHppBk2kkkgdclVhrCW/MSd3bMo4U7ddw/61stFnr+l91yNQmamBFRnnTho8jCY9N57HcFACa8b9/0VQOQGvdDwNQ/zXITal5cMKrX6X3Ed7BnM5BM9qcefxribvY5JsokxzuUGMpL+Agu/Xscx7sReMxi18/69a38CheUTxma/v7cK+BcgleR1bWOrqp4ronmPm2GQnkcZsbyqHgTdLPxGhO/pqhabVmkWXX6cjze8dxQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=hMxa+f70HMjo9+VTjsuWX8lZybQ1oOj80qdp38SOGdc=; b=s1zxnV1/d/cpZ3ZMO70VtsylpXGonlHrdaBwvsIp1v+QvmL6kTWM+5J9jzflkh5+5+pe5hrbqXesBto2Jto86FADMVg4IOKz/1O4nKQg481hCCKPOAfZu4omJGVczwsOyWTJaVD3RLCGNTnrK5M5T0J8kIcgpGXVXuFQVLyimRs=
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.23.12) by BN6PR11MB3955.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.255.131.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2387.24; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:57:09 +0000
Received: from BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:8548:e967:458e]) by BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::499:8548:e967:458e%12]) with mapi id 15.20.2387.025; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:57:09 +0000
From: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-04.txt
Thread-Index: AdWNQOVQabaxliJZSKidndMJAls3pQAWPM8AAAOKvIAAABWcAA==
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:57:09 +0000
Message-ID: <A9FA0AF9-87B3-41EE-9405-13DE4DA07728@cisco.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA93AD5B0@dggeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com> <B98EA06F-CC07-42B3-9030-7027F732583E@cisco.com> <0100016e13139e20-b340be7b-6617-4470-9d8b-e0f7149019de-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <0100016e13139e20-b340be7b-6617-4470-9d8b-e0f7149019de-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jclarke@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.74]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 846d4b43-cba1-473d-3e49-08d75bbf7d67
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN6PR11MB3955:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN6PR11MB395547A67237135AA1D5A824B8660@BN6PR11MB3955.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0204F0BDE2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(376002)(396003)(199004)(189003)(53546011)(76116006)(54906003)(478600001)(229853002)(14454004)(2906002)(5660300002)(91956017)(64756008)(11346002)(66556008)(446003)(66946007)(6506007)(66066001)(66476007)(66446008)(316002)(2616005)(476003)(6486002)(486006)(6512007)(54896002)(71200400001)(236005)(36756003)(71190400001)(256004)(6246003)(25786009)(6116002)(3846002)(6436002)(4326008)(186003)(99286004)(76176011)(26005)(102836004)(86362001)(8676002)(8936002)(33656002)(81166006)(7736002)(81156014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR11MB3955; H:BN6PR11MB1667.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HK1OcxonWe+rWYIgk+gxzQsaeiJWe+z96WIuQj9w8pqlH/1ifX3nnIom9mbV0r3/h4Dh7IC+a3q3MZSrIgMvyxKrkhRH7kEdFws7+PRzZ/3syS2VPOksy4jL6J458A6WuuB1X8xv3C0MoBdvc0GiLHK4NpjgU6kCCa8uLKbCILI9dO8sFocHlsTXBbWGt65cMhqMwaW9JAjW7rqxi8u+PYQLGHCaJHm7hE90KHjIjW3o7fgivvUpjRZO/0CSfrur+TC8qC5H7TS46rx3rXZwvYK8o9F8jQTAwIs0HWdElMomDklgSeDHSQyGeb7UUvqIGRYM3BhT1akjKTic3LJbN79h9lncVVRXTU5CXIytEpi8WRE8U3n4dRY9TTP1v/8YwxOqgM8iEwDwYaXwDsPA6xvH0r1mzun12nXIcosG3dbdeZ9jRkPhU54Nu7Rg858v
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A9FA0AF987B341EE940513DE4DA07728ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 846d4b43-cba1-473d-3e49-08d75bbf7d67
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Oct 2019 15:57:09.5954 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: F2HVX1U2i4b4O/HyVmWwC3LUBCXhoOMHOrwGm722SkB3Z9rCOZ3BHqEi61SYNUaylCRHQcWR+rNhnsmQo+D+mA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR11MB3955
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.20, xch-aln-010.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/0lX3SDGdX8N1_ygSjyMov8i3us8>
Subject: Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:57:20 -0000


On Oct 28, 2019, at 11:54, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net<mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> wrote:


Regarding this point:

First, I remember we talked about a reboot operation I think at the last IETF(?).  It was said that perhaps a reboot would happen as part of this RPC because once the <running> datastore is reset to factory-default, the device would not be reachable.  I don’t know where we landed on that.  However, I think some attention should be paid to things like zero-touch provisioning.  If I reset to factory-default, I would expect the device to undergo any out-of-the-box bootstrapping.  Perhaps adding some text that after the RPC is executed, the device SHOULD perform any initial bootstrapping processes?

Perhaps the draft could say something like:

"...resets the configuration to the device's factory default configuration, for the OS version it is running.  For devices supporting zero touch bootstrapping mechanisms, the factory default configuration causes the bootstrapping process to execute."

Works for me.

Joe


Kent // contributor