Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCEE126E64 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ts865GJbY6YK for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90101126B71 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1218; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507909199; x=1509118799; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ksDGgFZMu0li/K/gzmn4WSCX7YhhZfemTAFcEBcLn+U=; b=a56aSyUVJKSciza6igtFj9pvAvubsGMkAZ6zQV9Gp0HgmZuXAbWkOE86 P0tpEDBoqDsAahgY5zuU7b0h6aex0ZII5qEfCthvWStFeID3Bn2vkJVjM X3EKNwWwPNAkHzNPcr99PGLzZ3cKxmwYCFi6HQT3y8Be5bds8NNZ7DwVq M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DYAABp3eBZ/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhENuJ4N6ih90kBIili8QggQKGAuESU8ChRUYAQIBAQEBAQEBayi?= =?us-ascii?q?FHgEBAQMBASEVNhsLDgoCAiYCAicwBgEMBgIBAYoZEKs8gieLPgEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBAQEaBYEOgh+DWIIVC4J0hFIBEgGDMoJhBZhkiGKUa4IUhXaDWoc?= =?us-ascii?q?ujg+HYIE5HzhCQVY0IQgdFUmCZIRgPzaIO4I1AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,371,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="656337917"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2017 15:39:55 +0000
Received: from [10.61.88.2] (ams3-vpn-dhcp6147.cisco.com [10.61.88.2]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9DFdsjN029957; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:39:55 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <88288A22-2EF7-4491-A93A-2181ADACF994@juniper.net>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ddd62ee8-5dce-89e4-5810-679c60a085e1@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:39:55 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <88288A22-2EF7-4491-A93A-2181ADACF994@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/17Z51-EF6bNuobUF1EyMexLPefs>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:40:02 -0000

Hi,

Support.

I have also reviewed a previous version of this draft, and provided 
comments that I hope can be considered/discussed.

Thanks,
Rob


On 13/10/2017 15:37, Kent Watsen wrote:
> All,
>
> Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e.
> that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted
> legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the
> changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move
> ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these
> changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft.
>
> This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
> a working group document.  Please send email to the list indicating
> "yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
> your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
> provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
> document.
>
> The poll ends Oct 27.
>
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Lou)
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>