Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05

Hi,

"Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <bart.bogaert@nokia.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The latest draft does not contain an appendix with the deprecated state tree

Nothing has been deprecated since this will be the first published
version of this module.

> (to support the non-NMDA model as specified in RFC6087bis section 4.23.3),

This would be a "New module".

> so if it is published in this way, there is an issue at the level of BBF
> TR-383.

Can you elaborate on this?

6087bis says that we MAY include a temporay non-NMDA version (i.e., a
module with just /hardware-state), but it would be a different module
name (ietf-hardware-state) and a different XML namespace.

> Note that the draft-ietfnetmod-rfc7223bis does include the deprecated
> container interfaces-state.

Yes, since ietf-interface has already been published.

/martin

> 
> Best regards,
> Bart Bogaert
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:36 PM
> To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
> Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05
> 
> All,
> 
> This starts a two-week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-netmod-entity-05.
> 
> The working group last call ends on December 13.
> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
> 
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
> 
> Thank you,
> Netmod Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod