Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 01 March 2017 16:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3409E12960B; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:56:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5piYqHGHWY6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0092.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 932011294EB; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 08:56:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=H6C6CFGE+KiWmJbX1qUP4xR6phYnuXFsQ9eMFoQJnCA=; b=T04F+xJ8kYLL+nkA5zPGt1puMGtDj9eJIUZ/ePqVgY7z/2X+jtR8vnOcaMpKHTFKTQBSrTXqWb7L5NNEiIODobM+Jsx4UzZGx7xRj+bIzZRPe5CU3vNTKtNqBnvhmnxyAY73gzN2TmKzGvajY477lPnqvWWs5w+TrrC4Q76Euek=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.2; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:56:13 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.011; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:56:13 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
Thread-Index: AQHSjWtMgvd1I9y/IUSjVG5c54oSBqF9KfeA///YNICAAaCFAIAAJwsAgADg4ACAAAdRgIAAFKSAgAAWxDuAAAYCAIAAB3aA
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:56:12 +0000
Message-ID: <94364DAA-43B4-464C-B824-B46CF1BE499C@juniper.net>
References: <B6359563-0649-453A-B29F-28375F2BD3A4@juniper.net> <0830e87c-ee4f-bf53-2c51-96c166d3955e@cisco.com> <9A9AD440-953D-46D4-9207-97619D054912@juniper.net> <9d7b60aa-1690-c598-7034-2e430c7a8e0a@cisco.com> <3C31A53A-6818-451E-9BEF-5E568C4DCB65@juniper.net> <20170301080626.GC74969@elstar.local> <F29941EC-F118-4CCE-B295-824EC0C417CB@nic.cz> <20170301094629.GA75542@elstar.local> <05eb01d2927b$a75d2da0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <63B6599B-5295-4D88-AFA0-1A24890CF7C5@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <63B6599B-5295-4D88-AFA0-1A24890CF7C5@nic.cz>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
authentication-results: nic.cz; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nic.cz; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1fbdad8a-9fec-4695-a9d1-08d460c3de48
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(48565401081); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1442; 7:zjqVKOe1WSpOq9zUODoCfGeU+bviAD7ly6i6j3SJCnFcW0SQ5fdy15y6B1aDnjDO9iuwFvF81NjtHtF4/Av+++xLHzeoLSBfxpD2+/09xuoD9UxPGnj+OBWteXd3nJOFWx3J5QK7TiHtqtsi40Usl2OfQA+epSyur/CfzkjyoEarZ1cvLqPuza2Sbmgn8A+32keTiKMBh4G9U6Si3XshvN+xPYAWE0JJNLx4dgmjqAxmqUlz7HGbBRUmdKS00xEvJjs2fK76TDrmf5MjzZ0ZmyuTgi4gYe7yAYOhE5DNSkq5keukppZlvs/TVacwd2pUGlHlsx7SK9/lZiH9dOLn6w==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB14422B7F64F6CEC37208F3DAA5290@BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123558025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442;
x-forefront-prvs: 0233768B38
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39850400002)(39860400002)(39410400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(38730400002)(6512007)(6306002)(3660700001)(189998001)(86362001)(106116001)(54906002)(50986999)(54356999)(53936002)(66066001)(8936002)(81166006)(5660300001)(229853002)(76176999)(8676002)(25786008)(82746002)(305945005)(2900100001)(7736002)(36756003)(6246003)(2906002)(93886004)(83506001)(92566002)(122556002)(99286003)(3280700002)(8666007)(77096006)(2950100002)(6116002)(6506006)(33656002)(6486002)(3846002)(102836003)(4326008)(83716003)(6436002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1442; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CA3CBA38C270184CB89A11AFACDC3790@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2017 16:56:12.8400 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1442
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/1ufiIZ3IhG4EaaXzll_DuT098es>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 16:56:16 -0000

Hi Lada,

I understand your intention here, but I'm inclined to agree with others
that it's better to stick with the term we're using in the documents.
I'm open to the idea of changing the term used in our RFCs, and I believe
that such a change would likely have to begin with the YANG spec, from
which it could flow into other drafts.  With this in mind, I've added an
item to the yang-next tracker:

  https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues/17

and I plan to revert this change in the charter text.

Thanks,
Kent