[netmod] 6991bis: domain-name

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Fri, 29 March 2019 10:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1082E1202ED for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MseqFM6KpCM6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A7512025E for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from birdie (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1::380]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A892363080 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:20:14 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1553854814; bh=M6YyNS1Idccn2AQ/IrJA8eowPGduU4kQAoacBpOrHJ0=; h=From:To:Date; b=vS9T5ojmt7jKMFh/72uol49JyGmG4Y75dOKE0bQ5I+LnA/x5ORECXIyIwBmB3B8Vx Q7vZuK/QkfiQ16WOz04tYu3zqKPECnPXQ0mNRBMikROxZkQqQYqub6bQ1sfho8/Bv8 +cb8ZF0J3w/Gz9uhPbAnMxuGfzm7/8P6eydJED+0=
Message-ID: <b2aa592e7c78f54c75daa5af39a6c364a44a2c5a.camel@nic.cz>
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:20:13 +0100
Organization: CZ.NIC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2AS52i5Z8NEdtCnbKJOjrH3_ac0>
Subject: [netmod] 6991bis: domain-name
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:20:19 -0000

Hi,

as a follow-up to my comment during the NETMOD session, I want to propose the
following update to the the inet:domain-name type. The aim is to include use
cases that are currently rejected:

- classless in-addr.arpa delegations [RFC 2317], i.e. labels like "128/26"

- wildcards [RFC 4592], e.g. "*.example.net"

OLD

    pattern
      '((([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.)*'
    + '([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.?)'
    + '|\.';

NEW

    pattern
      '((\*\.)?(([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-/_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.)*'
    + '([a-zA-Z0-9_]([a-zA-Z0-9\-/_]){0,61})?[a-zA-Z0-9]\.?)'
    + '|\.';

Lada

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka
Head, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67