[netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Fri, 09 November 2018 18:35 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E24130DC0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:35:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lx5vk0s2nxHY for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC2B128CF3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:35:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id p86so2039182lfg.5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:35:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RRQvYHiX3py4AGzBZN8bDVxNUFytn/wplAJ14LbjfKI=; b=WCUL+aN+9fbH0Mx7pkuI4gs/qlEj4rloiAfDBkQMQvGBS11ZpzeXDqSppbrtKfv/Rn 2MpZMqNKvaQnrvrDF2Y/OZaX/bwCa+hebo4H/NQwyPACTtA1UmMFE5iqSOgpQIgN64C0 odWF5D9+jOGoivtmDQuYnhFV9eg8H2CE/y4jFHCMYUMCcGV91nzgugy3p7ktbNjDrHd4 azgpBtbubVtV2+d8+dEmhm+4ZcFERTLMzuOkHUMi/rDPMKg/xMbZQl7OwVVjJRTWhAzu WYq5NzF9jHz9LJwo/godFmMHhI6rGnGpJoPT0JmGW5RBXr0O+GbFLHB9o54cfcn1OMNv Zx4Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RRQvYHiX3py4AGzBZN8bDVxNUFytn/wplAJ14LbjfKI=; b=s8SF7GqL7TjuukTGR+WFzoRJjAUaZsWlasM+z2ymwdv4ecPBt3bEmeK5h00Uigqmdz 6BSJs6qtzZPfzgNJFJOMfczeZfWuJoUDraZUSAzgGk3PLhL3PgfetO52lhz1oZYxDLEo gjgMADWsAopEYwR1BIFl5jWsNsYa00gXoHn+XrKrkOOwUUfi0gxE0TtqrRN6fOOXf3xk rMJ/FM6JlcigVgXW46F4D7qj4S/0whsBJWs4501dXQQoOfnNtxv+54E3N5id1FH6RzG0 EFFP8pyclUQvg3h1WXpB0/Ph9OJlJFeKFPPf87oUEU1iSObMYfnExW1vOCOZqh037Avc wx2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIXJvxQ1gGmr4Jd7GPL+VOh6t8TnjRWZWfuC3ygXHwAuFrp1DRN AIYvD5LbyrFNa58E0EU+R+c2X42lSvMDOrLq+ERRcSdi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dQGZh7MGex48qmQ0BmKt9VTSVM0cvtAX9u7rpGD7SL4tKCmuNc6ZASp7ddegUqIofNtjogbKqU1ia9dcywyOs=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:6f0a:: with SMTP id k10mr5782303lfc.119.1541788520951; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:35:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a19:1f87:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:35:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:35:19 -0800
Message-ID: <CABCOCHQG0kCXUVqD9OBfmsAvFTgwzDzV8MP0=PRYHgiJR_Uvqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001c4a82057a3f9d5e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2CvYe16o3P3OjfFZ-_L2sy4JK0Y>
Subject: [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 18:35:25 -0000
Hi, I think the requirements doc should state that 1) there are many more readers, operators, and client developers than server developers so the solution MUST take into account the numbers of people affected when finding a balance between client and server complexity. 2) if existing protocol and YANG solutions exist then they MUST be used in favor of developing new solutions. Andy
- [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] missing YANG versioning requirements Andy Bierman