[netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 08 March 2018 00:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390D012008A; Wed, 7 Mar 2018 16:25:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, kwatsen@juniper.net, netmod@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.74.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152046870822.21375.9758886257105070758.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 16:25:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2Iq6KXMfprMcRk3fE1kL2KbOcGw>
Subject: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:25:08 -0000
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-23: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D4614 It's not a problem with this document, but I took a quick look at draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server and I've got some concerns. Here are a few examples: - You can set the cipher suite but not key sizes and groups You can - say sort of incoherent things in TLS like "I support TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.2 but not TLS 1.1" (there is no way to negotiate this in TLS 1.2) I'll try to get a chance to give this a real review, but I wanted to mention it before I forgot. We are using definitions of syslog protocol from [RFC5424] in this RFC. Not a big deal, but this introduction feels like it ought to say what the document is about, not just about syslog. The severity is one of type syslog-severity, all severities, or none. None is a special case that can be used to disable a filter. When filtering severity, the default comparison is that messages of the This seems to be the first use of the term filter to mean this entity subtree, implementations MUST NOT specify a private key that is used for any other purpose. It seems like the data that syslog writes is sensitive, so the ability to write a destination reflects a high degree of risk.
- [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ie… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draf… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draf… Benoit Claise