[netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8199 (5924)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 05 January 2020 16:55 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBB71200EB; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4CRrvdd0TMH; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928E6120018; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B8B28F406F7; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:11 -0800 (PST)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, dean@voltanet.io, bclaise@cisco.com, camoberg@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200105165511.B8B28F406F7@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 08:55:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2i2gxCKrp8__PiO-h9WQHorXtqk>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8199 (5924)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 16:55:38 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8199, "YANG Module Classification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5924 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Date Reported: 2019-12-02 Held by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG) Section: Section 6.1 Original Text ------------- 6.1. Normative References ... [RFC8049] Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049, DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>. Corrected Text -------------- 6.1. Informative References ... [RFC8049] Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049, DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>. Notes ----- RFC8049 is cited only as an example (Section 2.1): "An example of a Network Service YANG Module is in [RFC8049]..." Not sure why it was listed as normative. [Warren Kumari: Thanks to Benoit and Joel for review. ] -------------------------------------- RFC8199 (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08) -------------------------------------- Title : YANG Module Classification Publication Date : July 2017 Author(s) : D. Bogdanovic, B. Claise, C. Moberg Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC819… RFC Errata System