[netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8199 (5924)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Sun, 05 January 2020 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBB71200EB; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s4CRrvdd0TMH; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928E6120018; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B8B28F406F7; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:11 -0800 (PST)
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, dean@voltanet.io, bclaise@cisco.com, camoberg@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: warren@kumari.net, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200105165511.B8B28F406F7@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 08:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2i2gxCKrp8__PiO-h9WQHorXtqk>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8199 (5924)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2020 16:55:38 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC8199, "YANG Module Classification". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5924

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Date Reported: 2019-12-02
Held by: Warren Kumari (Ops AD) (IESG)

Section: Section 6.1

Original Text
-------------
6.1.  Normative References

...

   [RFC8049]  Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data
              Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>.

Corrected Text
--------------
6.1.  Informative References

...

   [RFC8049]  Litkowski, S., Tomotaki, L., and K. Ogaki, "YANG Data
              Model for L3VPN Service Delivery", RFC 8049,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC8049, February 2017,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8049>.

Notes
-----
RFC8049 is cited only as an example (Section 2.1):

"An example of a Network Service YANG Module is in [RFC8049]..."

Not sure why it was listed as normative.

[Warren Kumari: Thanks to Benoit and Joel for review. ]

--------------------------------------
RFC8199 (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-08)
--------------------------------------
Title               : YANG Module Classification
Publication Date    : July 2017
Author(s)           : D. Bogdanovic, B. Claise, C. Moberg
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG