Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2CD129637; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.018
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JhcfqNRdcgTC; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7BED129430; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 08:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2648; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478100947; x=1479310547; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=RUtL4M/MXMHxzUjSR95Ib3JRVrddNnc3TGZM/tt9I88=; b=DfISx0G5W5yrjgrptMDP4KV/3T0W8iZnr1/r8ngAjP45QNruZpgHUeOl x3/+8gaW5ZSrEM9cyUl7elXW0BT1X0vnk30iHMd9qssr8JYEeZegyZvCW a4MPQUT1RWe9nGPjjDCHTfpnzydpLVwA00bWPMZyxkcfVDNd5mDGFql+2 o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BtAQCGBxpY/4gNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QgBAQEBgywBAQEBAR9YfAeNMJcBkjiCD4IHKIV6AhqCCT8UAQIBAQEBAQEBYii?= =?us-ascii?q?EYgEBBCMRRRACAQgYAgImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWIVg6tEI0GAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBAQEBFwWBB4oLhBkRARwXgm2CXAEEiEmRVAGGMooHgW6Eb4ksjRiEAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?eNmeDLRcYgTtyAYYvgSCBDAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,583,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="166632211"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Nov 2016 15:35:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA2FZjrm005216 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:35:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:35:44 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 11:35:44 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Thread-Topic: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSNPdOhQSdMG+kCk+OlJAiOGf69KDF/TwAgAACs4D//9OpgA==
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 15:35:44 +0000
Message-ID: <D43F7FD3.875BB%acee@cisco.com>
References: <147808398811.24141.15196130392409336719.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <A7A00C9E-D76E-4BE3-8022-D2269E3D1F5B@nic.cz> <12326933-2397-817d-bfde-d6572bb46d06@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <12326933-2397-817d-bfde-d6572bb46d06@cs.tcd.ie>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D6AAE2B191075D42BB5917958A04A3FE@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/3ZzEeJdIf-5qEjcjD-sUFYfZqBk>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg.all@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:36:04 -0000

Hi Stephen, 

On 11/2/16, 10:14 AM, "Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:

>
>
>On 02/11/16 14:04, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> 
>>> On 2 Nov 2016, at 11:53, Stephen Farrell
>>> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; wrote:
>>> 
>>> Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
>>> draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24: No Objection
>>> 
>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
>>> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
>>> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please refer to
>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more
>>> information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
>>> here: 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> 
>COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>If there exists a draft for a yang module that augments this
>>> in a way that includes cryptographic values (e.g. maybe for an
>>> IPsec VPN or something) then I think that'd be a nice addition to
>>> section 11 as an informative reference.
>> 
>> One such module is ietf-key-chain by Acee et al. [1] Would it make
>> sense to include an informative reference to it?
>
>Not sure, but I think maybe not. Acee's draft doesn't
>seem to augment the modules defined in this one which
>is what I thought might provide useful information.

I believe the augmentation you are looking for exists yet.

Thanks,
Acee 





>
>S.
>
>> 
>> Lada
>> 
>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain-10
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>