Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Mon, 13 March 2017 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43EE1299FA for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EgfKgv7Ty2Xo for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B351299F4 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 11:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1228; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1489429218; x=1490638818; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g13v2cLsy+E4ZroXmYSpFQccakTMwv/ip6rJ+MMAfMc=; b=O5tIejqyV1YMQTZ1DGpGQ+IV4IBKvIKrmzbmHTS2UUZhvVA2Ea59REkA dwK1sazBuNFncoNXq4QC/r/SsFTFsOjY75AiykbrOA4yY6k2TrA4SiuE3 E4pyBlxfbke0KkP8OkqcrBbfJywYwQIB4Cjc5/2GYPmyELqAZj3zSLRXS k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BfAQAo4sZY/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhDIqYI1uc5BdlTuCDh8LhS5KAoMhGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?DAQEwAQU2CxALEAguJzAGAQwGAgEBiXwOsGKKUwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBARgFhk6CBYJqijkBBJxBkjmBe4hXhlOIRYJwiA4fOIEEIxYIFxVBhldANYl?= =?us-ascii?q?iAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,160,1486425600"; d="scan'208";a="650402031"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Mar 2017 18:20:16 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.115] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-115.cisco.com [10.63.23.115]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v2DIKGdq012164; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:20:16 GMT
To: netmod@ietf.org, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
References: <271CED23-8655-45A8-8E05-3ABD460871BD@juniper.net> <20170308193434.GA10080@elstar.local> <D4E9D4E5.A12DC%acee@cisco.com> <20170311.224951.2245774412799352894.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ff00c44b-e0f0-fb30-783f-a992e723da8d@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:20:16 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170311.224951.2245774412799352894.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/49f0vIdAmJfekxALdy3NkA2xqMw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:20:25 -0000

Hi Andy,

Would it make sense to update 6087bis section 4.4 to reference this new 
pyang option for generated tree diagrams?

Thanks,
Rob


On 11/03/2017 21:49, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>> Hi Juergen,
>>
>> On 3/8/17, 2:34 PM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
>> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of
>> j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote:
>>>> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this
>>>> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree`
>>>> and then manually edit from there).  What do you think?
>>>>
>>> Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not.
>> I frequently have to manually edit the pyang-generated trees to get them
>> to fit in the xml2rfc output. Is there a work around for this that I don¹t
>> know about?
> In the latest pyang, I have added --tree-line-length.  Use:
>
>    pyang -f -tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
>
> to fit RFCs.
>
>
> /martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>