Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Fri, 01 April 2022 06:08 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1543A20B3 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:08:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8tkMRQ1XAo4a for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C9A3A20C6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 23:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr22.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4KV8qb41cpz10FQ; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 08:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1648793307; bh=VFwec9dAEHve7SRBiLSE3TkkjapvSevPjAhgQtwdWnA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=E2U+pbEIHclZmE1axh4LXK9Ovfpn6W2fgkSCkxy77ga5ID/lCmWMY2eiIIBrvMhZA 2ym9IY9Qyp09UVnmhtsTE/7l0zEgOoHzKJkkVi7EWMjLC+zY0Ql9ggYaKlWnyRhiS9 HSk96s2GU88tNoRdxMC6o5KvHk+BtzqBbpEVTXiXa9fgyWKKdw24Qnz8SeLDZUJ4tX zCpQoRrfJ40x3LffqvpQU05I9dRAbNP9B4ondxaSl42/iSn+F/01WvZdolnr9MQ++e oj6wST6rO9wDYAH1HxYgsfJcBRxD9Hz/L5Ei9s5s7kcSIdbIO987UvMzjWwDnZ3kA4 fWu5XEzLXsHeg==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
CC: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>, "rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
Thread-Index: AQHYRSA4d0bxJZLVWk6OVsm6O09HQKzZmOYAgAD6AtA=
Content-Class:
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 06:08:27 +0000
Message-ID: <4234_1648793307_624696DB_4234_89_1_9ea4a9300d8341d5b564fea79025e391@orange.com>
References: <20220330212032.B1C784C1D2@rfcpa.amsl.com> <0100017fdcedaf32-a7793fc0-367f-4737-a505-6045ecfc74ed-000000@email.amazonses.com> <25000_1648704694_62453CB6_25000_113_1_315eaf0b15d04ffea9a7f1f5a7b07324@orange.com> <AM7PR07MB62483BF8820925D14E7609C3A0E19@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <f3673d5b-73d3-3274-f9bf-35f2f9646940@iecc.com> <CABCOCHSKXKjuBpytANO2WP9-mmJZ=Swtzz0M+0bKJvRBBZ1+ew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHSKXKjuBpytANO2WP9-mmJZ=Swtzz0M+0bKJvRBBZ1+ew@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-04-01T06:06:18Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=d9578c52-0851-4d2f-ae8a-2ce716118c73; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9ea4a9300d8341d5b564fea79025e391orangecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/4I_lHrBLqMg7BDvRX-pBneKKfdw>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 06:08:47 -0000

Hi John, all,

If we want the fix to the appendix to be immediately visible to the readers (in the rendered version), wouldn’t be more appropriate to mark this erratum as “verified” rather than “held for doc update”?

Cheers,
Med

De : Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Envoyé : jeudi 31 mars 2022 19:11
À : John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc : tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>; rfc-ed@rfc-editor.org; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899)



On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:56 AM John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com<mailto:johnl@iecc.com>> wrote:
> There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" :-), which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks.
>
> <tp>
>
> I agree.  There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it wrong but if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have been investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the TLP was made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the right mailing lists.

The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of
a deal.  If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual
license has never changed.  We just give it the correct name now.

I agree the checklist in Appendix A should be updated.

The corrected RFC (any RFC where Errata Exists) should be available online.
Not erasing the published RFC, but with a link to rfcNNNN-current (where all accepted Errata is applied).


Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com<mailto:johnl@taugh.com>, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly


Andy

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.