IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F1133200 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rR27j1oOTrdR for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5921331F6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1630; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1507914254; x=1509123854; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=CucmhE7lj8+roLkwLa2p4fzHly3ahlE0RfZ/3T6YSDs=; b=VMktosb3kaSUOyUqoEosiHAOq3cfDRnI1ZCfc3Frfyku03t/WnCnpwZz sedZIK9GuDhgYnd+kkEQqfWI6lZXgqt8vEi97uIttip5droH4UHoQ4+5E saZOB6/NYxRvR/w8jirBRrolMLufECf8xXBasGnY0DadDeNX8oYT3miaz E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DKAABi8eBZ/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg19kbicHg3OKH48ymCUQggQKGAuESU8chDw/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohR4GAQEhETodAQgODAImAgQlCxUSBAESih0Qq2uCJ4s/AQEBAQEBBAEBAQEBAQEcBYEOgh+CB4ZlhFIBEgEfF4J8gmEFoUYClGmCFIV2iwiVQgIRGQGBOAEfOIEDVnoVSYJkhF92iDuBJIERAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,371,1503360000"; d="scan'208";a="307560018"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2017 17:03:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (xch-rtp-014.cisco.com [64.101.220.154]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9DH3VtY013085 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:03:31 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-014.cisco.com (64.101.220.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:03:30 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:03:30 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
Thread-Index: AQHTREUxpoz3v+62/E2UPONcHF59Zw==
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:03:30 +0000
Message-ID: <D60669F5.CEA65%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <D21928C4679E5D4B9A96A85997ED3945@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/4ZuHwaaZLlN5J1KgSQzLsowc8fg>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 17:04:16 -0000

As co-author, I support and am not aware of any IPR.
Thanks,
acee 

On 10/13/17, 10:37 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"
<netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:

>All,
>
>Now that we have resolved the module naming issue on the list (i.e.
>that keeps the original rfc module names and updates the unwanted
>legacy nodes to have status 'obsolete'), rather than wait for the
>changes to be made in the individual document, we'd like to move
>ahead with the adoption now, with the understanding that these
>changes will be made in the -01 version of the adopted draft.
>
>This is start of a two-week poll on making draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-03
>a working group document.  Please send email to the list indicating
>"yes/support" or "no/do not support".  If indicating no, please state
>your reservations with the document.  If yes, please also feel free to
>provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG
>document.
>
>The poll ends Oct 27.
>
>Thanks,
>Kent (and Lou)
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>netmod@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email